Application: Kevin Azite

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Okay, but in the end I'll leave it to HoudiniMan and the other PWA's more solid judgement to decide.

[TSAdmin]

Darlene - Give yourself an infraction for talking about bans

I'd leave a comment relating to the application, but I'd prefer not to make comments for/against other applicants Good luck.

[TheFisherman]

Approval.

[Horrified]

Originally Posted by TSAdmin

Darlene - Give yourself an infraction for talking about bans

I'd leave a comment relating to the application, but I'd prefer not to make comments for/against other applicants Good luck.

Haha, I'm the same way. If you're an applicant and go around ranting on other's applications, you really do look like an idiot. Not like I haven't done that enough already.

apparentally though, if everything you say isn't 100 percent serious, it's a no-go for approval from the public though.

[[email protected]]

Vocabulary of a young man, attitude of a 10 year old.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I gave my input. The reasons you were banned here were pretty bad, and it doesn't matter to me if it were yesterday, or last year. What I look for is how many, and for what. IMO, you would be a terrible choice for this job, sorry

Rule 6<B>.

Originally Posted by Darlene159

Notice to all moderators of these forums
I will not have moderators of these forums that break the rules they are supposed to enforce.
If you want to moderate here, read the rules, know them, follow them, and enforce them, or you will be removed.

I will not have moderators that disrespect members.
I will not have moderators that call members names.
I will not have moderators that argue with members in open forum.
I will not have moderators that cannot try to be helpful.
etc.....

Questions? Forum PM me. Do not start a thread about this issue.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

Rule 6<B>.

This is an app for a global position. The banning on the forums is valid input, so what is your point?

[Nabru]

Never, I would sooner die than you be a global of some sort.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

This is an app for a global position. The banning on the forums is valid input, so what is your point?

following your philosophy, should it not be handled by PM?

Originally Posted by Nabru

Never, I would sooner die than you be a global of some sort.

calm down guy, it's a game.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

following your philosophy, should it not be handled by PM?

No, since the applications are public to get peoples opinions. the opinions should be based on important things, and behavior on the forums is important.
I am the forums Admin, and I have the info to share. I can make a decision to make an exception because I deem it important, and Unixmad trusts me to do that

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

calm down guy, it's a game.

Is this going to be your reply to pwa issues?

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

No, since the applications are public to get peoples opinions. the opinions should be based on important things, and behavior on the forums is important.

Your opinion however, is based on information that is privy to the public, and is supposed to remain so. As I read in the rules, there is to be no discussion of bans, and now I feel that Graal Online has violated its agreement with me by violating its own rules.

I am the forums Admin, and I have the info to share. I can make a decision to make an exception because I deem it important, and Unixmad trusts me to do that

so in other words, its acceptable for GraalOnline to renege on its own rules at any time? Seems kind of unfair to the players, and I still feel as if my privacy has been greatly violated by your choice to be liberal about my previous
bans.

Originally Posted by unixmad

Threads are public and everyone can give feedback about what he/she think about someone. Feedback need to be about skills and not about personal attacks.

Also, what skill of mine are you commenting on? My skill to get banned? Seems more of a personal attack than a legitimate criticism of my ability to assist/administer Playerworlds.

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by p2p_Sir_Link

Your opinion however, is based on information that is privy to the public, and is supposed to remain so. As I read in the rules, there is to be no discussion of bans, and now I feel that Graal Online has violated its agreement with me by violating its own rules.



so in other words, its acceptable for GraalOnline to renege on its own rules at any time? Seems kind of unfair to the players, and I still feel as if my privacy has been greatly violated by your choice to be liberal about my previous bans.

I am done trying to explain it to you....I'm not going to debate it, or argue with you. Read the forum rules in their entirety.

[p2p_Sir_Link]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I am done trying to explain it to you....I'm not going to debate it, or argue with you. Read the forum rules in their entirety.

I took about a minute or so to skim the rules once again, and funnily enough, I cannot find any sort of immunity clause for admins/moderators in the rules.


EDIT: missed this part

Originally Posted by Darlene159

Is this going to be your reply to pwa issues?

I'd expect it to be reasonable of any PWA to attempt to calm down a disgruntled player who was threatening suicide over Graal.

I guess you, on the otherhand, would wish to encourage some sort of lawsuit...

[TheFisherman]

leave him alone darlene

[Twinny]

She did it for alot of us and it seems part of the process. If you're exceedingly embarrased about your forum doings, you should probably not apply. Why question when the moderators make exceptions to the rules?