Does a playerworld need to be "Hosted" before it can be "Classic"?

[KuJi]

Originally Posted by Tyhm

*shrugs* Everyone offers me a place to test, but nobody actually PMs me with "Okay, you're set up on Playerworld_57, you can upload the ganis, graphics and levels to tyhms_baddies - but it's the only folder you can see, so don't worry about it."

Need one? I have another server until about February still.

[Rufus]

Ibonic quit Graal today, therefore I'm unsure about what will happen with the project now, I don't want to take the manager lead and I'm not sure if I trust anyone else as much as I did him.

We'll see.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Rufus

Ibonic quit Graal today, therefore I'm unsure about what will happen with the project now, I don't want to take the manager lead and I'm not sure if I trust anyone else as much as I did him.

We'll see.

That's too bad. Rufus was showing me some progress over AIM and it actually looked cool.

[Crimson2005]

I've been following the progress of the server, it has loads of potential. I'd really hate to see it go to waste

[Inverness]

If you want cooperative multiplayer for that, limiting each dungeon or whatever to 4 people would probably be ideal, of course the server is going to have more than 4 people, so you're going to have to create instances of the same special areas on the server. Or else you get overcrowded in once place.
Thats something i'd love to see though, 20 people charging through same dungeon in Zelda. It would be memorable.

[Devil]

Good Idea, that's what I always ****ing hated on Zodiac, every dungeon would be packed full of idiots and hard to level

[Tyhm]

Kinda like the Random Dungeons on Kingdoms?

It's a good idea...I mean, you want to have Some multiplayer interaction, but within limits...