New Graal Wiki logo

[Fox1545]

I got bored and made a new logo (and favicon) for the Wiki. It does not really fit the stylesheet, but it is made of vectors and that means it is awesome.

Discuss! and submit improved versions

Edit: I Am Really Bored bonus picture

[Bl0nkt]

Very awesome.

It'd be awesome x2 with a transparent background.

[Goboom]

Originally Posted by Fox1545

I got bored and made a new logo (and favicon) for the Wiki. It does not really fit the stylesheet, but it is made of vectors and that means it is awesome.

Discuss! and submit improved versions

Edit: I Am Really Bored bonus picture

Eww...

[Zero Hour]

Originally Posted by Goboom

Eww...

Are you saying vectors are ew?

[OasaTor_PK]

What is a "Vector"

Screw google, amaze me.

[Draenin]

First image I like. Second image... yeah, not so much.

[Curt1zzle]

Originally Posted by Draenin

First image I like. Second image... yeah, not so much.

My thoughts summed up ^

[Goboom]

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

Are you saying vectors are ew?

No vectors are wonderful things, his "logos" are "Eww...".

[Valder]

Originally Posted by Goboom

No vectors are wonderful things, his "logos" are "Eww...".

Agreed...

[Zero Hour]

Originally Posted by Goboom

No vectors are wonderful things

Gut [:

[coreys]

Originally Posted by OasaTor_PK

What is a "Vector"

Screw google, amaze me.

...leave...now...

[Fox1545]

Originally Posted by Bl0nkt

It'd be awesome x2 with a transparent background.

The left picture, which you are talking about, has a transparent background.

Originally Posted by Goboom

Eww...

Your opinion is too negative. Do not post in my threads any more, please.

Originally Posted by OasaTor_PK OasaTor_PK is offline

What is a "Vector"

A vector is an object defined by both magnitude and direction.
Had you clicked the linked word "vector" in my original post, you would have received more useful information.

Originally Posted by Draenin

Second image... yeah, not so much.

Yeah, me neither. It is mostly a quick hack and has neither an elaborate concept nor careful execution. More detailed critique would be welcome, though.


Okay, why do you guys even keep spamming this u suk lol stuff if you will not even bother to give any reasoning? This is not critique, this is not even trolling, it is plain useless, and you cannot base a discussion on that.

[Zero Hour]

Originally Posted by Fox1545

Your opinion is too negative. Do not post in my threads any more, please.

Well, it may be "negative" it wasn't really hostile. Or atleast not as hostile as "Don't post in my threads anymore". Regardless, he may post where he wishes.

Originally Posted by Fox1545

Okay, why do you guys even keep spamming this u suk lol stuff if you will not even bother to give any reasoning? This is not critique, this is not even trolling, it is plain useless, and you cannot base a discussion on that.

This is a public forum, many people who browse it are capable of actually productive criticism a lot more aren't. I, personally, ignore them if their critique doesn't help. But even if it isn't productive criticism it doesn't mean it's pointless spam. You have to expect people to give their opinion's, like "Ewww".

If you can't handle that, maybe you should be turning your attention inward and not to the other members.

[Antago]

They are both nice. However, you must understand that the red star (Bomriket) is larger in actuality than the yellow star (Unipordum). This is the story, anyway. And, if you will carefully notice, on Graal2001, a Bomriket year (with the red star and redder colored nights) has more months. This is not because the orbit around it is further from the star itself, but rather because the star is larger by two Graal months (as a month is literally a representation of real, physical velocity).

So, is the yellow star closer to the camera and the red star is far away, behind the planet? Or did you simply not realize this? If so, they are vectors and modification should be very easy.

I enjoy your leaf avatar and your vector styling so far. Your bomy planet could use more detail, like the red trees, making the bomy-moon actually be brown and look like it is protruding, etc.

[Fox1545]

Originally Posted by Zero Hour

Well, it may be "negative" it wasn't really hostile. Or atleast not as hostile as "Don't post in my threads anymore". Regardless, he may post where he wishes.

No, he must not. The forum conforms to a bunch of rules, and I am happy to know that Moonie actually enforces this, and usually takes the appropriate measures to get rid of inappopriate negativity. You just cannot get away with flaming people, and that is spam whether it is someone's opinion or not.

Originally Posted by Antago

So, is the yellow star closer to the camera and the red star is far away, behind the planet? Or did you simply not realize this?

Both. The yellow star is supposed to be in front of the planet, hence the lighting, and the red star is supposed to be behind it, but I actually had no idea of the size relations.

If so, they are vectors and modification should be very easy.

Yeah, but creating an exact represenation of a whole solar system with all its astronomical distances quickly gets tricky, so I am not exactly sure how to do that. Do you have any diagrams that detail the movement of the stellar bodies in the G2k1 world?

I enjoy your leaf avatar and your vector styling so far.

Thank you

Your bomy planet could use more detail, like the red trees, making the bomy-moon actually be brown and look like it is protruding, etc.

Yes, it could. I was going for a very simple style, here, putting focus on the contrast between the blue and the green colour. This is because I was being pretty lazy.