Hiring GFX for VS:CONFLICT - Page 2

Infernix · #16 01-24-2007, 12:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykel

Why is it stupid?

What reason do people have to play Versus if it isn't there? Because it's a classic server? So is Unholy Nation and N-Pulse. They already have a playerbase on those servers. What would make people want to really play the server?

I understand that it's a classic server, but it still has to have somethink that sets it apart from other classic servers.

Please note that a argument isn't going to change his mine about the idea lol.

Mykel · #17 01-24-2007, 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Infernix

Please note that a argument isn't going to change his mine about the idea lol.

I was just trying to get him to understand where I was coming from.

MysticX2X · #18 01-24-2007, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WanDaMan

...it is.

With leveling? I'm not a huge fan of leveling servers. But good luck

Mykel · #19 01-24-2007, 12:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MysticX2X

With leveling? I'm not a huge fan of leveling servers. But good luck

leveling =/= RP

Also, in VS, the leveling system doesn't dominate gameplay. Not to mention, the leveling is based completely off of playerkilling. If you don't PK it doesn't really hurt you, but if you do, it's just kind of an added bonus and gives you extra insentive to continue to do so.

Infernix · #20 01-24-2007, 03:18 AM

Kids role play all the time outside but they don't always level for some reason. Must be a flaw in the game rofl.

NeoJenova · #21 01-24-2007, 05:13 AM

ima be a beast on vs...

brakk · #22 01-24-2007, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NeoJenova

ima be a beast on vs...

hehe nice :P

Chandler · #23 01-24-2007, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykel

Why is it stupid?

What reason do people have to play Versus if it isn't there? Because it's a classic server? So is Unholy Nation and N-Pulse. They already have a playerbase on those servers. What would make people want to really play the server?

I understand that it's a classic server, but it still has to have somethink that sets it apart from other classic servers.

I think you're misinterpreting the word "classic", I'm pretty sure that WDM was to mean "V$:C is going to be classic, not as in the new age classic such as Zodiac.". However, on such an instance, I could be mistaken!

Futher more, I do deeply think that this idea is rather pathetic, and is just trying to keep the player occupied with something to do on V$:C. However, since alot of the worlds -- player; have something similar to this, I don't think that V$:C should be doing this.

Darklux · #24 01-24-2007, 12:23 PM

Classic for us means.. pk, quests, events, playerhouses, nifty towns, loads of secrets, hours of fun, years of conversation with nice people.

What else would anyone want?

Another thing we try to be classic in:

Our level style aims to be nice, functional and nostalgic, and we try to achieve this aim with using many tiles of current pics1 with some additional tiles of older tilesets.

I think, that many fans of graal like it was years before, will like the server - but it will still be something special. No UN or anything which exists right now on other servers.

Chicken_l33t · #25 01-24-2007, 12:44 PM

I bet you didn't put a NPC of me on the OW, Wan! ass.

maximus_asinus · #26 01-24-2007, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chicken_l33t

I bet you didn't put a NPC of me on the OW, Wan! ass.

I think Wan should turn every NPC on the OW into me.

MysticX2X · #27 01-24-2007, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykel

leveling =/= RP

Also, in VS, the leveling system doesn't dominate gameplay. Not to mention, the leveling is based completely off of playerkilling. If you don't PK it doesn't really hurt you, but if you do, it's just kind of an added bonus and gives you extra insentive to continue to do so.

Yeah i know. It's not going to be fully classic if it has leveling and **** in it.

Mykel · #28 01-24-2007, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chandler

I think you're misinterpreting the word "classic", I'm pretty sure that WDM was to mean "V$:C is going to be classic, not as in the new age classic such as Zodiac.". However, on such an instance, I could be mistaken!

Futher more, I do deeply think that this idea is rather pathetic, and is just trying to keep the player occupied with something to do on V$:C. However, since alot of the worlds -- player; have something similar to this, I don't think that V$:C should be doing this.

I know with classic means. Zodiac isn't "classic." You are indeed mistaken. Also, you think that the idea is pathetic because if tries to keep the player occupied with something to do? Um, isn't that a good thing?

Chandler · #29 01-24-2007, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mykel

I know with classic means. Zodiac isn't "classic." You are indeed mistaken. Also, you think that the idea is pathetic because if tries to keep the player occupied with something to do? Um, isn't that a good thing?

Could you point out where I am mistaken, your post is pretty confusing.

It's a good thing, if you wanted to make "your" playerworld a replica of anothers.

Mykel · #30 01-24-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chandler

Could you point out where I am mistaken, your post is pretty confusing.

It's a good thing, if you wanted to make "your" playerworld a replica of anothers.

You were confused because you assumed I didn't know what you meant by classic playerworld. The fact that you even mentioned Zodiac as a classic type server shows how confused you must have been.

Oh, and how many servers have a leveling system based solely off of PKing?

Now, how many servers are pure classic?

Yeah, I'm not the one talking about a server that is a replica of others. You are.