A Time for Change

[darkemporor]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Even still, he's the only one with whom it looks like that. There should be a rule against it =(

Oh please, no more rules! How silly, the posts on this page were made like...

falco, nappa, falco, protagonist, busyrobot, falco, gozelda, busyrobot, monkeyboy mcgee, falco, gozelda, falco, gozelda, busyrobot, gozelda...all sensibly ordered responses...

Falco did one more post than you, but it's a flaw in the tree mode display which has nothing to do with the way a user posts, so Im not sure how it could even be avoided.

Wren

[busyrobot]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Even still, he's the only one with whom it looks like that. There should be a rule against it =(

ummm, I don't think he even realized he was doing it, if you took the time to check the dates of the post you'd see the chronology was staggered with the other posts in the thread.

[GoZelda]

Originally Posted by darkemporor

Falco did one more post than you, but it's a flaw in the tree mode display which has nothing to do with the way a user posts, so Im not sure how it could even be avoided.

Eh it does have something to do with the way the user posts.

ummm, I don't think he even realized he was doing it, if you took the time to check the dates of the post you'd see the chronology was staggered with the other posts in the thread.

Well no, because the time span in between was at most one hour, enough time for someone to think 'uhm I'm bored. *posts*'. One hour later:'still bored. *posts*'. And because there was no reference or anything at all, I thought he was just spamming.

[darkemporor]

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Eh it does have something to do with the way the user posts.


Well no, because the time span in between was at most one hour, enough time for someone to think 'uhm I'm bored. *posts*'. One hour later:'still bored. *posts*'. And because there was no reference or anything at all, I thought he was just spamming.

Not really.

Falco's last 4 posts:

Yesterday, 05:18 PM
Yesterday, 09:06 PM
Today, 11:59 AM
Today, 01:00 PM

All of them exceed three hours apart save one. Nothing wrong with his posting habits.

Wren

[falco10291029]

Exactly, If i am online, i tend to reply to anything contradictory to what i say, so Lance and I were having aty it for a while, i was obviusly winning . I never do im bored posts, those i usually criticize when others do it. I also only double post when it is 2 different topics that quoting and editing dont work as well for, but i never doubled in this thread anyway, so kindly shut your trap

[Dehitay]

OMG, have you bumbs really not figured it out yet?
Let me say this one more time
a Republic DOES NOT infer that the citizens vote on the respresenting leader
a Republic simply means that a person represents the people of the republic
in Zormite's case, their representative would be the dictator
It is a democracy that infers that the citizens vote
but a democracy does not infer that they have a person to represent them

Stop cross referrencing a Republic to the system the US uses
We uses a Democratic Republic
in which we vote (democracy) to elect somebody to represent us (republic)
We are neither a Democracy or a Republic

[TeRRi2k]

I don't see why this argument is going on and on about what a republic is...etc. I thought the purpose of this thread is to say that Akira is the new Dictatress. I don't see arguing about this (all the above posts etc...) has much to do with this

[falco10291029]

Thats what we have tried saying, i ahve tried a couple times to get back on topic though....

[Lance]

Originally Posted by Python523

I didn't know "Kaimetsu's Word" was a synonym for "the rules".

I didn't know "there not existing a valid rule to support your action" was a synonym for "Jagen". Then again, you deleted posts with the reason 'This person is a ****ing idiot', so I guess you're an expert in that department.

As for the remainder of the argument/discussion: I don't care anymore. I'm closing this thread, as both the main topic and the offtopic participants all agree on a close, which does happen to be permissible.