Hiring one scripter. Info Inside.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by syltburk

Did that really take you 30 minutes?

What are you talking about?

[nullify]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I am sick of seeing members attacked by other members who think they are "superior"

You forgot to break in with one of your infamous "thread closed" statements and actions.

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by Loriel

I think evidence inside your inbox is worthless while it stays there.

Evidence enough to me, I have nothing to prove to you, the thread worked, that's all that matters. I had to turn several people away.

[FenixTheBanished]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You know, it would be really nice to go into a scripting thread just once, and not see scripter staff (or scripters) attacking people =/

Don't go into the threads anymore then.

Honestly, I dont know why some of you should even be allowed to post on these forum ...

Because they haved payed for the subscription, and have not broken any rules, except the ones pending in your mind.

For God's sake, if all you have to say are negative things towards someone, then just dont post!

Negativity can be constructive, it's when somebody deems the sake is God's, we all go crazy and flame you.

The guy is looking for a scripter, if you are interested, contact him...if not, leave him alone unless you have something constructive to say that might be of some help to him.

But all Kaimetsu has done was say constructive things. He meerly said that Raelyn should provide information about his project if he wants to help the scripters decide if they are intrested, past the USD payment possibility. Where, but in your post (or somebody quoting your post), is there anything that is not constructive?

I am sick of seeing members attacked by other members who think they are "superior"
Because on these forums, no one is superior over anyone....

And that's why you're a supermod, right? That's why you seemingly get off on deleting posts without notice/cause, and closing threads while confused newbies wonder why they cannot post anymore?

you are ALL members.

As are you.

[ThinkDifferent]

Darlene is it absolutely necessary to use God's name on an ONLINE GAME message board?

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by ThinkDifferent

Darlene is it absolutely necessary to use God's name on an ONLINE GAME message board?

Diehard christians should not be playing graal, because through GK it promotes worship of false deities.

I'm worshipping Balor now, IRL, because he is going to "put the smack down" on god.

[Slash-P2P]

Originally Posted by Raelyn

Diehard christians should not be playing graal, because through GK it promotes worship of false deities.

I'm worshipping Balor now, IRL, because he is going to "put the smack down" on god.

I knew worshipping on Graal was bad
Thats going in my sig

[ThinkDifferent]

DIE HARD CHRISTIAN? Are you retarded? Many other religions worship God. Think before you speak.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by ThinkDifferent

DIE HARD CHRISTIAN? Are you retarded? Many other religions worship God

Don't be stupid. He didn't say that only Christians need be concerned.

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Don't be stupid. He didn't say that only Christians need be concerned.

Thank you Kai, yes, I am aware that christians are not the only ones that worship god or a godlike figure, however, christians are generally the most pushy when it comes to converting the rest of the world and in my experience are the first to say "You're going to hell." if you mention any other god-like figures even just for the sake of open-mindedness.

Which is why I related to them in that statement.

[ThinkDifferent]

Well then say what you intend to mean, rather than being so broad and vague

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by ThinkDifferent

Well then say what you intend to mean, rather than being so broad and vague

He was not vague in the slightest, and the very source of your disagreement was that he was (in your opinion) not broad enough.

Look, the root of the matter is this: He could have said "devout members of any religion that forbids worship of false idols", or he could have said "diehard Christians". Given that the latter is much more concise and covers the majority of the former anyway (within this particular audience), I think he made the right choice.

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

He was not vague in the slightest, and the very source of your disagreement was that he was (in your opinion) not broad enough.

Look, the root of the matter is this: He could have said "devout members of any religion that forbids worship of false idols", or he could have said "diehard Christians". Given that the former is much more concise and covers the majority of the latter anyway (within this particular audience), I think he made the right choice.

Thank you once again Kai, you never cease to amaze with the ability to flame me in one post and agree with me entirely in another.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by Raelyn

Thank you once again Kai, you never cease to amaze with the ability to flame me in one post and agree with me entirely in another.

I just go with whichever side is in the right, man. It's not a personal thing.

[Raelyn]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

I just go with whichever side is in the right, man. It's not a personal thing.

I must be right on a 50/50 basis, however, I was unaware that my other post was a right or wrong thing, it was more of a "Hey, this happened, to whom it may concern."