ANNIHILATE THE HEATHENS! For the Republic! - Page 4

Valder · #46 02-13-2006, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GryffonDurime

Hi; the forums are, by their very nature, OOC. Ergo, you are the one using superfluous parantheses. Your post makes me doubt your maturity level, if you would tell someone else to stop their whinning and in the same breath claim victory over a bit of minutea that you do not apparently even understand the workings of.

Have a nice day.

Haha... I love you Gryffon... I'm pretty sure that Chaos just got owned by your post

Damix2 · #47 02-13-2006, 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosXxX

((Damix you sir are wrong, You had a bunch of 105's compared to level 50s and 20s. You wouldnt of won if you were evenly matched in levels. So why dont you stop your whining you may of won the first battle but you didnt win are spirits. Also arent you suppose to be a RP kingdom? If so maybe you should start acting like it and instead of saying oh i was posting in a forum, Maybe you should start typing OOC stuff in ( and ) instead of just talking. You sir just got owned by this post so there i win a battle now ****.))

It seems this is the level of maturity that Zormite has. Jesus what is wrong with all your heads.

Butz · #48 02-13-2006, 06:41 PM

See, now this is why there needs to be some sort of organized and judged war system. Otherwise it devolves into a 3rd grade argument of "I PwnED U!" " NO I K1lL3D j00!", and so on.

ApothiX · #49 02-13-2006, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

It seems this is the level of maturity that Zormite has. Jesus what is wrong with all your heads.

Do not judge the maturity level of a nation because of the actions of one person. I'm pretty sure there are a few people in Samurai who are less mature than you would want, aswell.

Craigus · #50 02-13-2006, 06:49 PM

I actually tried to log on for this war but had connection problems

would of been nice to be there for the Samurai victory! grats guys

Damix2 · #51 02-13-2006, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApothiX

Do not judge the maturity level of a nation because of the actions of one person. I'm pretty sure there are a few people in Samurai who are less mature than you would want, aswell.

The 3 heads of your various sections have all showed immaturity.

Yea Shawn, we do need some sort of battle system.

Googi · #52 02-13-2006, 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

No I am saying its not a battle unless 2 players in power agree to it.

So the vast majority of battles that took place on 2K1 (which generally followed the model of spontaneously attacking a kingdom's castle) were, in fact, not battles?

Damix2 · #53 02-13-2006, 07:34 PM

2k2 does not equal 2k1.

We have to deal with different game mechanics and very different levels of roleplaying.

Cubes · #54 02-13-2006, 07:38 PM

2k1=better and funner than g2k2

GoZelda · #55 02-13-2006, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosXxX

((Damix you sir are wrong, You had a bunch of 105's compared to level 50s and 20s.

Yeah, I mean when the Netherlands have a war with the USA they can say "Yeah but you had nuclear bombs" and then the USA says they did lose the war and the Netherlands totally owned USA.

HA!

No, it doesn't work that way. If you know you are gonna get owned, why even challenge them?

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChaosXxX

You sir just got owned by this post so there i win a battle now ****

Let's say you *did* own Damix and Lylic.

Who else did you own. Perhaps, dunno, your own leader, idiot boy?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matthew_White

impotent Lylic

It's a war over viagra now ???

Googi · #56 02-13-2006, 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

2k2 does not equal 2k1.

We have to deal with different game mechanics and very different levels of roleplaying.

And somehow this changes the definition of a battle?

Damix2 · #57 02-13-2006, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi

And somehow this changes the definition of a battle?

From a roleplaying standard yes. We don't have the ability on Kingdoms to be able to hold random battles without immaturity prevailing.

You also hold a nostalgic view of 2001 along with everyone else on this forum, the roleplaying wasn't very good either, and most battles were pathetic excuses of a proper roleplaying battle.

Googi · #58 02-13-2006, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

We don't have the ability on Kingdoms to be able to hold random battles without immaturity prevailing.

That's why you don't like spontaneous battles, but that doesn't mean that they're invalid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damix2

You also hold a nostalgic view of 2001 along with everyone else on this forum, the roleplaying wasn't very good either, and most battles were pathetic excuses of a proper roleplaying battle.

Except that I posted before that 2K1 RP wouldn't live up to the standards of elitists on 2K2 and also explained why this was a good thing.

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=59267

OasaTor_PK · #59 02-13-2006, 11:23 PM

We can just say its a tie. a PK war cant go either way. Both kings were killed regardless if it was during wartime. Most wars dont go for 1 battle then say "LOLKEKE I OWNT U U GO KRY NOW NUBECAKE" Perhaps me and googi, and vamp were assasinationerpeople, and killed both Damix and Lylic. SO I WIN LOL U OWNT.
And in the james post, you can see him going "lol" thats good RP skillzorz.

Damix2 · #60 02-13-2006, 11:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OasaTor_PK

We can just say its a tie. a PK war cant go either way. Both kings were killed regardless if it was during wartime. Most wars dont go for 1 battle then say "LOLKEKE I OWNT U U GO KRY NOW NUBECAKE" Perhaps me and googi, and vamp were assasinationerpeople, and killed both Damix and Lylic. SO I WIN LOL U OWNT.
And in the james post, you can see him going "lol" thats good RP skillzorz.

If you wanted a PK war, then you guys lost horribly. Only ONE of your members did not die. If there was any idea of a you die and you don't come back your kingdom would have been defeated in a matter of minutes.

If you were trying to roleplay killing me and Lylic, then you failed. You killed 2 members while they were away and Gryffon will be the first to tell you that the consent rule was breached there.

Samurai was victorious, you invaded and we made you retreat, a few members not listening to your leader does not constitute another battle.

Googi, you just proved my point by showing that 2k1 and 2k2 had/have different standards. Your "attack" on our castle could have been called a war on 2k1, but not on 2k2.