Make Graal Classic a Trial saving server?

[Zero Hour]

Not a bad idea, Moon God, but -

asking to have a trial saving server is like asking a city to open a area called "Teh Ghetto"

The ghetto is the way it is because of low-income families, now don't get me wrong, I'm not comparing the problems most ghettos have to low-income families, I mean the quality, etc. Can you expect prof. quality on a new b server? I doubt it.

[Milkdude99]

ehh my idea was more for all servers instead of just one server. :shrugs:

[DarkShadows_Legend]

Maybe charge 99$ for the year to allow trials to save on a server? or 59$ for 6 months?
Don't pay then no trials save.

[Zero Hour]

Oh, but I fail to add something, Moon God. I think that classics should only be allowed to play Classic, Era.

[ReBorn_Spirit]

How about you just simply get them a small offline level or two that they can see what graal is actually about..
And then just leave a few notes and stuff in there talking about how graal is like while playing online.

[matt8891]

How about not bringing back old threads.

[Milkdude99]

New People of the Forum will tend to revive old threads because it is the first time they have seen the thread old or not.....

[jake13jake]

Oh my, it's been two or three days... I better post something...
Naaa... I just have been banned for the past two weeks so now I get a chance to respond. Wait a second, what was I going to say again?? Oh wait... I remember. I think Graal would probably be more profitable if they built ads into the interface of trial accounts and allowed them, in turn, to save. I mean, reg could prevent a person from using more than one account when the game has logged a trial account, right?