Zone Forum Rules: What's up with this?

[Darlene159]

Originally Posted by Dante55555

SN wouldn't do something like this if he didn't feel he had good reason to.




This made me laugh..

Exactly

[Shadow5596321]

Originally Posted by Dante55555

SN wouldn't do something like this if he didn't feel he had good reason to.

That or he wanted to feel a bit more important by deleting posts. It's a bull**** rule and you know that.

[Dante55555]

Originally Posted by Shadow5596321

That or he wanted to feel a bit more important by deleting posts. It's a bull**** rule and you know that.

As I said, SN would not have made it if he did not have a good reason for doing so. Maybe you should send him a Forum PM and ask him what prompted him to make such a rule?

[Elizabeth]

maybe he should have forum pmed me first instead of deleting my post right away, and asking me what i meant by qft

[Dante55555]

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

maybe he should have forum pmed me first instead of deleting my post right away, and asking me what i meant by qft

He doesn't have to. If he views it as against the rules he is fully within his rights to act accordingly.

[Shadow5596321]

Originally Posted by Dante55555

He doesn't have to. If he views it as against the rules he is fully within his rights to act accordingly.

If he deletes something his isn't sure about, He should contact Jesse or you. If Jesse or you didn't know, You should ask Sam or Darlene.

[Elizabeth]

Originally Posted by Dante55555

He doesn't have to. If he views it as against the rules he is fully within his rights to act accordingly.

views and meaning are two different things.

[DarkReaper0]

Originally Posted by Darlene159

Dont push it. He had his reasons.

I'm sorry Darlene, but really?
You'd go as far to defend a ludicrous position like this?

And no we aren't pushing it, because the moment we let our guard down someone is going to find a way to crush us like a bug.
If we don't make it perfectly clear that the players will not stand for complete ******** rules, it's only going to happen again, and again, and again, and again.

Originally Posted by Dante55555

He doesn't have to. If he views it as against the rules he is fully within his rights to act accordingly.

Re-read her post, he had no idea if it was against the rules and promptly **** his pants, deleted it, and THEN asked questions.

Guilty until proven innocent.
Shoot first ask questions later.

Shall I go on?

[Dante55555]

Originally Posted by DarkReaper0

If we don't make it perfectly clear that the players will not stand for complete ******** rules, it's only going to happen again, and again, and again, and again...shall I go on?

Yes, please. As a moderator he can do such things, but don't act like he's all powerful.

You know very well you could contact Darlene about it or make a thread like this and it would be handled, as this thread proves.

The players objected to the rule, so Darlene saw your side and changed it.

Please don't try and play the victim card on me.

[DarkReaper0]

Originally Posted by Dante55555

Yes, please. As a moderator he can do such things, but don't act like he's all powerful.

You know very well you could contact Darlene about it or make a thread like this and it would be handled, as this thread proves.

The players objected to the rule, so Darlene saw your side and changed it.

Please don't try and play the victim card on me.

Two things:
I'm not playing a victim card, I'm merely making a statement that the users of this forums are always getting the short end of the stick (the EXTREMELY short end of the stick, a splinter in many cases) and that we're constantly battling to make sure we keep that last bit of freedom we have left.

And second, that part of the post was not intended for you, the part I'm talking specifically to you about is under your quote. Respond to that please.

[Dante55555]

Originally Posted by DarkReaper0

And second, that part of the post was not intended for you, the part I'm talking specifically to you about is under your quote. Respond to that please.

Certainly.

From the Forum Rules:

c) If you feel that you have been wronged by a moderator, contact a higher member of staff such as a supermod or admin, and calmly explain the situation. Do not disregard what you have been told, regardless of whether or not you consider it fair or reasonable.
====
i) Have a question about a deleted post, thread, or edited post? Forum PM the moderator that did it, and do NOT derail the thread asking why, or discussing it. This makes members have to sift through a derailed thread just to see replies to what the thread is about.
====
I like this one:
====
d) The rules were made up to make these forums comfortable for the majority of the users. Do not make threads/posts complaining about, or discussing these rules. If you have a question, or a complaint about the forum rules, use a forum PM, or the support center.
===
Some of you may argue that SN made these rules up so they don't fall under that category.

You're wrong.

Unless I'm gravely mistaken, Darlene approved what he posted so they fall under the exact same category as the others. Once again, unless I'm gravely mistaken this thread shouldn't even be here.


EDIT: I'm going to close this thread. Darlene can re-open it or delete it, I'll leave it up to her. The rules clearly state that this thread is against the rules but I'm hesitant because Darlene herself was posting in it..

In any case, the main point of this thread has been covered. The rule was changed, there's no reason to keep bickering and flaming.