Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ApothiX
The reason was not 'because crono said so', it was because it was highly inactive. This thread just brought it to the attention of the PWA. If the manager of the server is just now noticing that it got removed, then that may be a reason why you were not contacted.
|
Okay listen buddy.
1. You never go on SL and you are not a part of SL and you don't know if it's active or not.
2. I am also a manager of SL and I have access to debug, private forums and have continually complained to staff about certain situations related to SL. In the PWAs eyes they should know who is manager and this already shows how unprofessional acts are taken in certain conditions like this.
3. I just noticed it got removed because I got back from vacation. Meaning I had no internet access to come here and see someone complain and BOOM removed. How ironic?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gerami
Osnaps :[
I thought they did.
Man I am GOD. How can you say that answer is not acceptable :'[?
But isn't it hidden now?
I don't care what he hell's been happening, SL is dead and has been for many years. It just keeps re-releasing, has maybe 100 players for that day, and it dies faster than the server's NPC server.
|
The last part of your post was completely an opinion and exaggeration on every single part.
To say SL is dead is completely wrong. Loakey puts in so much time into the server (especially lately). Also for 're-releasing' the last time we were released to the public was in 2004... that was 2 years ago. After that so many servers have be re-released and gets an whopping 20 players. I don't know why you even tried to say SL just keeps releasing itself over and over and over because that is completely false.
The point here is I was not contacted at all and this act was obviously pulled because of your stupid thread pointing your finger at "inactive" playerworlds. Not only was your post just a simple opinion and pointing out the obvious and somehow twisting it to make it seem like all SL staff do is sit on their ass and watch our beautiful 0 playercount remain but it was completely unresearched.
Why all of a sudden do globals feel compelled to remove SL? Was it truly inspired by this thread?
Now SL is 'hidden'... what the hell does that mean? Since the PWA rules don't state what exactly happens when a playerworld is removed because of a player complaining on the GCC and is put on hidden... does it mean we have to resubmit? With that said, the current SL already meets the requirements for the classic tab and was successfully put on the list. In no way did SLs staff completely abandon the server... So what do we have to do now?
We sit and wait... resubmit... and it gets put up? We don't know what we have to do anymore. Might as well make a rule that states "If your playerworld meets the requirements but people complain on the GCC about it being inactive even though staff are still developing... then you will be removed."
Thanks to the brilliant staff who was influenced to do this and not taking anything into consideration but to simply seem like a meer hero. Even if it was Stefan, this was not a good time for this.
How about more people put more time into the
GOLD tab and the falling current overall player count of graal.
SL was not hurting anything, we had our plans.