Since posting private history is illegal... - Page 3

ApothiX · #31 01-10-2006, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

So you're saying I shouldn't have said what it was for? Just leave out a bit of essential information?

Oh you could have said what it was for. But if you didn't want critique on your website, then you should have just done exactly that: say what it's for, but don't show what it's for.

GoZelda · #32 01-10-2006, 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApothiX

Oh you could have said what it was for. But if you didn't want critique on your website, then you should have just done exactly that: say what it's for, but don't show what it's for.

So eventually you think it's logical that my website gets criticised in a thread where I only asked for information?

ApothiX · #33 01-10-2006, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

So eventually you think it's logical that my website gets criticised in a thread where I only asked for information?

Welcome to the world of public forums, where everyone is entitled to their own opinion unless Moonie says otherwise.

GoZelda · #34 01-10-2006, 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApothiX

Welcome to the world of public forums, where everyone is entitled to their own opinion unless Moonie says otherwise.

It is logical that when I ask for A I get B, then?

CidNight1142 · #35 01-10-2006, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Draenin

What's that I hear in the distance? Why, it's the whaaaaaaa-bulance!

Roflcopter

ApothiX · #36 01-10-2006, 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

It is logical that when I ask for A I get B, then?

Judging by the website in question, yes it is.

GoZelda · #37 01-10-2006, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApothiX

Judging by the website in question, yes it is.

You know, it could be useful if you argumentated some thing, such as why judging by the website in question all laws of physics are rendered nihil.

ApothiX · #38 01-10-2006, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

You know, it could be useful if you argumentated some thing, such as why judging by the website in question all laws of physics are rendered nihil.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApothiX

Erm, I'm going to have to agree with whoever said it was crap. The layout is lacking, the color scheme makes me want to have a seizure and the content is far from.. entertaining?

Also, I'm not sure what the laws of physics has to do with your crappy website

GoZelda · #39 01-10-2006, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ApothiX

Also, I'm not sure what the laws of physics has to do with your crappy website

I ment the laws of logic. And, I did not ask for an argumentation of your opinion of my website, but why judging on my website it suddenly is possible that I get A when I ask for B.

PrinceDark · #40 01-10-2006, 09:16 PM

Quote:

What would the punishment for staff be if they encouraged someone to post private history?

None. Why fire someone for encouraging someone else to do something. That other person should use their own common sense to decide whether or not to post the history.

Quote:

Would you think that is a flame post?

Yes. It is not good negative criticism at all. It is negative yes, but they don't say how the website is poorly designed, what it is lacking, or anything at all about what is wrong with the website itself.

GoZelda · #41 01-10-2006, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrinceDark

None. Why fire someone for encouraging someone else to do something. That other person should use their own common sense to decide whether or not to post the history.

So, a staffmember that encourages someone to hack should get away with it too?

And, let's just say that the encouragement was like this:
"Just post that, to see how it works out"

Would that still be correct?

Darklux · #42 01-10-2006, 10:25 PM

Can you wash your damn laundry wherelese?

I dont think this is the right place.
This thread is only ending in cussing.

- Niki

PrinceDark · #43 01-11-2006, 08:06 AM

Wait do we have 2 anderws arguing here?

Quote:

So, a staffmember that encourages someone to hack should get away with it too?

lol. ok. With my very same logic, yes, even with that situation I still believe the staff member is not responsible for it. I will agree with you that it isn't right, but I wouldn't hold him responsible for the actions of another. This is sort of all like the "Hey my son wanted GTA, and now he's running around stealing cars. I'm gonna sue the game creators for my son being in the hospital cause someone shot him."
Sorry for being so much like them evil lawyers, but thats just the way I perceive this to be similar to.

Crono · #44 01-11-2006, 08:32 AM

If the private history was posted with permission, nothing should happen. If it was done without permission, -ANYONE- (not only staff) should get an equal warning or something as it is against the rules and is invading people's privacy.

I don't think it's anywhere near a flame. If unixmad got on and went "DUD UR WEBSIT SUKS" he can say it as much as he wishes because it's not a flame nor against the rules.

Quote:

Can you wash your damn laundry wherelese?

no sry we r hoboz we kant afrod 2

Quote:

I dont think this is the right place.

We do.

Quote:

This thread is only ending in cussing.

ololol so? Atleast something productive might come out of it, even if it is "cussing" (boohoooooooooooo ;O; )

Lance · #45 01-13-2006, 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PrinceDark

Wait do we have 2 anderws arguing here?

lol. ok. With my very same logic, yes, even with that situation I still believe the staff member is not responsible for it. I will agree with you that it isn't right, but I wouldn't hold him responsible for the actions of another. This is sort of all like the "Hey my son wanted GTA, and now he's running around stealing cars. I'm gonna sue the game creators for my son being in the hospital cause someone shot him."
Sorry for being so much like them evil lawyers, but thats just the way I perceive this to be similar to.

Your analogy fails because the games don't tell you to go out and do that in the same scope (game vs real life) where the hypothetical staff members are telling you to commit the crimes in the same scope (game vs game).