GScript <-> GScript2

[falco10291029]

I got mos tof it, like the fact that it was creating something, it's just complex and a little hard to follow, and seems like it will be ahrder than gscript 1

[Ajira]

I, personally, cannot wait.

[Admins]

Originally Posted by falco10291029

I got mos tof it, like the fact that it was creating something, it's just complex and a little hard to follow, and seems like it will be ahrder than gscript 1

No it's simplier, try the same with the old engine ...
e.g. imagine this:

setstring clientr.hp,#v(strtofloat(#s(clientr.hp)) + 1);

in new script is

clientr.hp++;

[falco10291029]

Originally Posted by Stefan

No it's simplier, try the same with the old engine ...
e.g. imagine this:

setstring clientr.hp,#v(strtofloat(#s(clientr.hp)) + 1);

in new script is

clientr.hp++;

*tears of joy* Wow, editing strings with ++? It's so beautiful. But on a more serious note, i obviously meant the script you showed, not all of it since I can't possibly know what all the commands/ transformations will be like.

[LogicBot]

Originally Posted by Slash-P2P

That's supposed to be simple?

Looks simple. Current gScript looks more complicated to me.

[Slash-P2P]

Originally Posted by LogicBot

Looks simple. Current gScript looks more complicated to me.

Some parts look complicated (such as Stefan's example), and some parts look easy such as changing a string with ++

[Kaimetsu]

Dudes, that wasn't a string.

[protagonist]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Dudes, that wasn't a string.

It was a spicey meatball! How could you all have been so mistaken!?

[Admins]

In new scripting engine all variables are variant and are handled depending on the operation, so if you do + then it is automatically converting string to float. When changing "clientr.hp" it is also automatically sending it to the client (transferred as flag/string like before).

A simplier example:

NPC Code:

---

  for (pl: allplayers) {

    if (!(pl.x in |577,1008| && pl.y in |-200,320|)) {

      pl.x = 768 + random(-5,5);

      pl.y = 44 + random(-5,5);

      pl.sendrpgmessage("Sorry you cannot walk out of this yet.");

    }

  }

---

This is for warping people back to the town (on graal3d) if they go out of the town. As you can see it is using the new for-each command, and you don't need to use the with-command so often anymore, since you can call functions of the object easier.

[Ajira]

This is for warping people back to the town (on graal3d) if they go out of the town. As you can see it is using the new for-each command, and you don't need to use the with-command so often anymore, since you can call functions of the object easier.

I love it.

[falco10291029]

I wished that would have crashed when i was allowed on G3d, i REALLY wanted to go play with the dragons

Hmm that example makes gscript 2 look better. Seems as if for certain things converting to it won't be too hard. Im geussing the for (pl: allplayers) means that it is defining pl as allplayers and will be looking at everyone's values for that.

[Slash-P2P]

Originally Posted by Stefan

A simplier example:

NPC Code:

---

  for (pl: allplayers) {

    if (!(pl.x in |577,1008| && pl.y in |-200,320|)) {

      pl.x = 768 + random(-5,5);

      pl.y = 44 + random(-5,5);

      pl.sendrpgmessage("Sorry you cannot walk out of this yet.");

    }

  }

---

I understand it

[Benm00t]

Originally Posted by Slash-P2P

I understand it

So do i, and Gscript1 just went right over my head.

<3 for GScript2. Like Kai said before, if you've ever used a language like C then you should be right at home with GScript2. :-D

[Slash-P2P]

Originally Posted by Benm00t

So do i, and Gscript1 just went right over my head.

<3 for GScript2. Like Kai said before, if you've ever used a language like C then you should be right at home with GScript2. :-D

I've been using gscript1 since I first started playing Graal back in like 99 or so..

[LogicBot]

Originally Posted by Slash-P2P

I've been using gscript1 since I first started playing Graal back in like 99 or so..

"I started playing Graal in 1982, but then we called it 'Zelda Offline' in those days.."



And the simpler one looks more complicated. I hate it when you have to put it in: "&&.{#, script enabled}+!!@#.. @!}" or at least thats how it looks to me. I'll get used to it.