Revolt! - Page 3

Nappa · #31 01-18-2005, 02:57 AM

No, we can't.

I sent a pm to spark questioning why he closed one thread WEEKS ago. Got my reply yet ?

Yeah, right.

Slash-P2P · #32 01-18-2005, 03:46 AM

Slash will join.

Minoc · #33 01-18-2005, 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

You can get your point across without being sarcastic, and biligerant =/

http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=56899
Didn't help. >_>

Evil_Trunks · #34 01-18-2005, 07:35 AM

Yes, they will prevail!

Your suggestion would have no effect.

I would also suggest that users be forced to pick a post they are replying to, instead of allowing them to (quick) reply without picking the post. I have seen other vBulletin forums use this.

Evil_Trunks · #35 01-18-2005, 07:37 AM

I would say that the only way they apply to this thread is:

They may not be used as a valid excuse for breaking the tree structure!

GoZelda · #36 01-18-2005, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

Is there a reason as to why you could not have done this through forum pm's? I mean it is a legitimet request I suppose, but this thread is rediculous, and I really havent seen any mods complaining about the double/triple posting, I have only seen complaints about the not quoting...I am pretty sure that I always quote unless it is a general statement to everyone in the thread.

You can get your point across without being sarcastic, and biligerant =/

Why is that you are above 10, English is your first language but still can't spell?

The reason I didn't do this trough PM:
1] To let others state their opinions and thoughts on the matter
2] For a member of the rebels to object against it's participation
3] For a member of the oppressors to object against it's participation
4] So the rule would have a change of being added.

Second, you say that you haven't seen mods complaining about the double/triple posting. Almost none, or none of the mods use hybrid view so this annoying rule doesn't affect them. And, since when do the mods matter and do the actual users of the forums throw no weight on the scale?

Darlene159 · #37 01-18-2005, 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

Why is that you are above 10, English is your first language but still can't spell?

The reason I didn't do this trough PM:
1] To let others state their opinions and thoughts on the matter
2] For a member of the rebels to object against it's participation
3] For a member of the oppressors to object against it's participation
4] So the rule would have a change of being added.

Second, you say that you haven't seen mods complaining about the double/triple posting. Almost none, or none of the mods use hybrid view so this annoying rule doesn't affect them. And, since when do the mods matter and do the actual users of the forums throw no weight on the scale?

1) My spelling has nothing to do with this thread.
2) It is really hard to take this thread seriously with all the sarcasm, and bull in it.
3)I meant that I dont think the mods have been warning people about double/triple posting because of the new changes to the board.

I happen to agree with the point you are making, but your sarcasm, and rudeness just makes me want to ignore you.
All you had to do is (if you insisted on making a thread) say what rule you thought needed to be changed and why, without all the bull...positive threads/posts go a long way.

I see no reason why the rules cant be modified to fit the different views as you pointed out, if Spark and Kamuii agree

GoZelda · #38 01-18-2005, 10:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

1) My spelling has nothing to do with this thread.

I just found it awkward, and it confused me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

2) It is really hard to take this thread seriously with all the sarcasm, and bull in it.

You understand this depends on your point of view and your opinions, right? Shouldn't a mod be objective more then subjective in such cases?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

3)I meant that I dont think the mods have been warning people about double/triple posting because of the new changes to the board.

They (possibly you) did so in the case of Loriel.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I happen to agree with the point you are making, but your sarcasm, and rudeness just makes me want to ignore you.

What rudeness? You seem to take criticism very hardly, and I still believe it is your task to be objective.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

All you had to do is (if you insisted on making a thread) say what rule you thought needed to be changed and why, without all the bull.

You may find it bull...(aren't you evading the swear filter?), others may not. My points was made clear, that's all that matters.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

I see no reason why the rules cant be modified to fit the different views as you pointed out, if Spark and Kamuii agree

That's great.

Darlene159 · #39 01-18-2005, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

They (possibly you) did so in the case of Loriel.

I believe I got upset with Loriel because he was constantly posting without quoting who he was talking to, not because of double/triple posting, I was well aware that he was using the tree version.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

You may find it bull...(aren't you evading the swear filter?)

No, since when is bull a curse word?

GoZelda · #40 01-18-2005, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

No, since when is bull a curse word?

It is terribly obvious you ment to say bull****. If you didn't, your sentences also would make no sense.

LordZen · #41 01-19-2005, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

the Pluffy Gang
Nappa
UrbanLegend
Scotth-P2P
Slas

herefrom to be called 'the rebels'

the mods (excluding ZanderX/Kamuii, Ben Rain, Lance and Zen)
Falco

herefrom to be called 'the oppressors'

How did I manage that exclusive list I wonder. Thanks lol.

Lance · #42 01-19-2005, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

It is terribly obvious you ment to say bull****. If you didn't, your sentences also would make no sense.

Oh, come on. 'bull' is a euphamism for the word you refer to.

Evil_Trunks · #43 01-19-2005, 01:25 AM

I don't see the problem with her using bull.

To me that's like saying dumb instead of dumb***.

(turns out *** isn't even censored)

Even if I just made no sense, I don't see how skipping the obcene part of a word is bad.
bull**** isn't censored, just ****

Darlene159 · #44 01-19-2005, 01:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda

It is terribly obvious you ment to say bull****. If you didn't, your sentences also would make no sense.

No, I meant to say BULL , nothing else...anyway, I'm not going to argue with you, lol

Minoc · #45 01-19-2005, 06:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159

All you had to do is (if you insisted on making a thread) say what rule you thought needed to be changed and why, without all the bull...positive threads/posts go a long way.

So could you please unlock this thread?
http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=56899