Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerTFFD
Who are your two primary whiners? I think I've exposed more flaws in the process than anyone and I had no agenda.
|
The people I'm talking about are people I've openly criticized throughout this entire process. They know who they are. If you don't know what I'm talking about, then you're probably not on the list of whiners.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackSolider
I assume that most people believed that, although they didn't play classic, the PWAs would do a thorough enough investigation to get the opinion of the majority, and, combined with their own opinions, decide on who the new manager would be, if one was needed at all.
|
The PWA's experience involving Classic should have been called to attention from the very beginning, along with various other issues. It seems petty to bring it all up after everything has been concluded just because some didn't get their way. I acknowledge that some people have valid complaints to question the review's validity (like Stryker), but most are complaining for various other reasons such as; they didn't get into the Manager's position they've been pining to get into, don't like who the PWA appointed on a personal level, or was told to complain. Again, all pretty childish and petty reasons to complain.
Then there are the people who are bringing up the two Manager system. I have mixed feelings regarding this. Your primary example is using a fairly unstable individual (Ibonic) and a very inactive Storm. I think the variables have changed quite a bit (if Storm chooses to stay active, and Thor continues to be a rational person). BUT in the end, you might be right. There might be some issues regarding various projects in the future, but I'm hoping the PWA will actively monitor the server and resolve issues before they become too volatile. We can't make any decisions just yet. We need to give the who thing a little time so we can see how it'll turn out.
Also still looking for those poll results.