what do you prefer?

[GoZelda]

Opiniated. Duh.

[calum]

If this is done by you, a member of Graal News, I would expect an un-opinionated REPORT rather than a review.

[Skyerus]

Opinionated!

[Crono]

Opionated. It's more interesting to read and open to debates.

[xAndrewx]

If these people get a global rc I would probably quit graal.
A hacker is in Gnews called Contiga, So watch out.

[Splke]

Opinions interfere in factual statements, and opinions make very good points, detailing why or if it is good, while the negative things about the reviewed item, are either avoided or meerly noted, deemed not as important or over-shadowing as compared to the good points in the review item.

However.. reviews lacking opinions entirely make it bland, boring, and don't make you a good reviewy. You need to balance your opinions with fact's, and take care not to let your opinions boarderline opinion, and bias.

I've writen alot of Gamefaq.com reviews for games, afew critiquing things that I know alot about (probably a video game or a football related quiery). I don't really know what this thread is directing attention towards, a graal.net return ? ; as well as reviews on Graal related things? Or NGRT ?