Arg, having tags 'CoManager' is just wrong, the tags should be Manager, but you would refer to yourselfs, or to two managers as CoManagers. Just as you call all the people you work with CoWorkers.
It is just like saying:
We co-exist on earth.
We exist on earth together.
Also, the Asst. Manager should be just called Admin.
I made an outline of a staff list I suggested to MD (I have been doing suggestions to him throught the time I was "staff" there 2 weeks ago, and he ignored most of it), so I'll show you it all, just because I want to:

*Note: The numbers just mean the max amount.
Manager (2)
Admin (1)
GP Chief (1)
GP (3)
Level Team(4)
Scripts Team (4)
Graphics/Gani Team (4)
Positions like ETs, Webmasters etc... should not have RC, as they just take up space, and RC is for Administration and Development. Not chit-chatting all day about stupid things. Oh, and if you have a Guild Admin or Staff Manager, they are pointless positions and should be deleted. This just shows that the Managers/Admin cannot do their job.
**Managers would have level 4 rights.
Admin would have level 4, except server options, set rights, set folder rights and set folder configuration.
GP Chief would have level 3, but not set flags.
GP would have level 3, but not set flags.
Level Team would have level 2, plus set/view attributes.
Scripts Team would have level 2, plus set/view attributes, and NC.
Graphics/Gani Team would have level 2, plus set/view attributes.
Small team of staff, which is orgnaized and lead by a good, likeable Manager is most efficent.
**Managers are the
only ones allowed to have level 4 rights (setrights, setfolder rights, server options and folder options) I believe. I talked to Spark about it while at Bravo, and he agreed. I told him about it because half the staff had full level four, and was the reason behind the server being taken over 2 weeks ago; that and ip ranges were not set, though I did tell Sky and MD to set them.