Why All The New Pws??? - Page 2

Aknts · #16 07-22-2002, 03:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
yeah. i sit around and don't inspect them. wow.

You've inspected Murasamune and Oasis?

Torankusu · #17 07-22-2002, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aknts

You've inspected Murasamune and Oasis?

How many other people have? Think about what you're saying here. It's not just my opinion you're calling moot, but everyone that thinks they (oasis and murasamune) will "own."

Aknts · #18 07-22-2002, 03:19 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
How many other people have? Think about what you're saying here. It's not just my opinion you're calling moot, but everyone that thinks they will "own."

What does this have to do with you saying that you would rather play an online playerworld over two that you haven't even played yet? Unless you have played all 3, your statement nulls itself out.

How do you know that those playerworlds will not be of better quality? Sure you inspect playerworlds, but you're not psychic.

What are some of the great aspects of Shaded Legend? I've played it before, and aside from the snazzy menu, I see nothing to do. I see levels with grass and flowers just randomly filled in, tons of empty houses, and absolutely nothing to keep me playing there.

Torankusu · #19 07-22-2002, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aknts

What does this have to do with you saying that you would rather play an online playerworld over two that you haven't even played yet? Unless you have played all 3, your statement nulls itself out.

Your statement should have the same reaction to everybody's opinion. My example was pointing out how you are nullifying my opinion because I do not favor your playerworld, and murasamune, but other people that do (and have not also played on it!@) have an opinion that is not moot!

Quote:

Originally posted by Aknts

How do you know that those playerworlds will not be of better quality? Sure you inspect playerworlds, but you're not psychic.

You can't prove that.

I don't know much, but what I do know, with all of these fancy graphics and new systems, I would prefer a classic playerworld over some super high-tech playerworld with nice graphics and a creature.

Quote:

Originally posted by Aknts

What are some of the great aspects of Shaded Legend? I've played it before, and aside from the snazzy menu, I see nothing to do. I see levels with grass and flowers just randomly filled in, tons of empty houses, and absolutely nothing to keep me playing there.

The storyline is nice, until it branches off to the questing part, which I can't seem to find a lot. I'd prefer to play at Classic, than shaded legend or murasamune/oasis any time, then.

Aknts · #20 07-22-2002, 03:33 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu

Your statement should have the same reaction to everybody's opinion. My example was pointing out how you are nullifying my opinion because I do not favor your playerworld, and murasamune, but other people that do (and have not also played on it!@) have an opinion that is not moot!

Did I say that people who said Oasis rocked were right? You assume this. Nobody but me knows what Oasis is really going to be like, so yes, all opinions about it that aren't by me, do not hold any ground since no one has played it.

It has nothing to do with you not favoring my pw. It has to do with the fact that you are stating one pw is better than two you have never even played. That's like saying one car is better than two that you have never driven, even if those two could possibly be 10 times as good.

You're also basing your opinion of my pw on a couple graphics and snapshots. You completely rule out my playerworld as fun in your opinion just because you don't want to play a game with creatures and high-tech features in it? My menu system is no more complex to use than Shaded Legend's is. You speak of things you do not know, as if you know all about them.

Torankusu · #21 07-22-2002, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aknts

Did I say that people who said Oasis rocked were right? You assume this. Nobody but me knows what Oasis is really going to be like, so yes, all opinions about it that aren't by me, do not hold any ground since no one has played it.

It has nothing to do with you not favoring my pw. It has to do with the fact that you are stating one pw is better than two you have never even played. That's like saying one car is better than two that you have never driven, even if those two could possibly be 10 times as good.

You're also basing your opinion of my pw on a couple graphics and snapshots. You completely rule out my playerworld as fun in your opinion just because you don't want to play a game with creatures and high-tech features in it? My menu system is no more complex to use than Shaded Legend's is. You speak of things you do not know, as if you know all about them.

shaded legends doesn't have bodies that "need more gani attributes."

by the way. i'm done. you can continue to talk about your playerworld. I doubt I'll really enjoy it, and I was just stating my opinion. No need to tell anybody they're wrong for having an opinion.

Aknts · #22 07-22-2002, 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu

shaded legends doesn't have bodies that "need more gani attributes."

How does this affect gameplay? The Oasis characters will look normal when you play. They have lots of attributes because you can change their clothing and armor and things. You don't HAVE to do this. You can just play with the character as default and never change a thing. Shaded Legend uses old bodies that you change colors with. Oasis has new bodies that you change clothes with. Complexity = 0

Torankusu · #23 07-22-2002, 03:40 AM

by the way. i'm done. you can continue to talk about your playerworld. I doubt I'll really enjoy it, and I was just stating my opinion. No need to tell anybody they're wrong for having an opinion.

Faheria_LAT3 · #24 07-22-2002, 03:44 AM

mmmmkay: It's not just you two who think alike, I'm sure there are many people who think that, because it is so blatantly obvious. http://forums.graal2001.com/forums/s...threadid=33468

Aknts · #25 07-22-2002, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
by the way. i'm done. you can continue to talk about your playerworld. I doubt I'll really enjoy it, and I was just stating my opinion. No need to tell anybody they're wrong for having an opinion.

Your opinion matters because you are part of the PW Administration. PW Administration shouldn't be basing opinions on playerworld's they have not even played. Can you imagine how it would be to have to send a pw to you? Well gee, this guy already told me he doesn't like my pw at all yet he is supposed to review it. Really encouraging genius. Let's not be smug and post stupid replies like "i'm done" as if you're so manly that you can leave the arguement. Wow Torankusu, you are so cool.

Torankusu · #26 07-22-2002, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aknts

Your opinion matters because you are part of the PW Administration. PW Administration shouldn't be basing opinions on playerworld's they have not even played. Can you imagine how it would be to have to send a pw to you? Well gee, this guy already told me he doesn't like my pw at all yet he is supposed to review it. Really encouraging genius. Let's not be smug and post stupid replies like "i'm done" as if you're so manly that you can leave the arguement. Wow Torankusu, you are so cool.

You're right, in a way. We would know about it if you people didn't keep going around the submissions. (excluding murasamune.)

"I'm done."

Want the thread to be closed or deleted? I don't see much of a point in this thread, considering mmmkay's is still here.

Xbob42 · #27 07-22-2002, 03:53 AM

"Can't get a position on a playerworld that asks for help but says they don't need help."

Not mentioning any names, but it seems there are a few current online playerworlds that are going by this extremely weird saying.
So others just go on with their own projects.

The second thing you'll notice is half of them are composed of RC hungry people and people that produce. Sadly not all can be accomplished if there's not a team effort.

Brad · #28 07-22-2002, 04:01 AM

I'm a newbie for trying to start a pw. ok.

Xbob42 · #29 07-22-2002, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Brad
I'm a newbie for trying to start a pw. ok.

RAWR! I love your signature.

Frolic_RC2 · #30 07-22-2002, 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Torankusu
You're right, in a way. We would know about it if you people didn't keep going around the submissions. (excluding murasamune.)

Heh was about to confront you on that, then I saw the "(excluding murasamune.)".

But really now, konidias is right about one thing, you openly confront Oasis and Murasamune, as a PW reviewer...it doesn't make us very confident of getting a unbiased review from submitting to you, those kinds of things make us want to try to get around the reviewers.

Heh, no offense, but I kind of wish Psyker was still around =/. I have seen alot of PW reviewers, and I have always wondered why some let garbage go up, or have bad reviews, or are biased...Psyker was none of these. And don't say "well you say that only because he passed Murasamune" because nearly ALL of the reviewers have passed Murasamune. I just feel Psyker did the best overall job, sadly usually those who do great things leave quicker then those who don't =/.