loadSubFolders(str, int);

[xXziroXx]

Originally Posted by Inverness

Zero I don't think you understand how the function is working.

Arigato for the backup.

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by xXziroXx

Arigato for the backup.

Using Japanese like that triples your cuteness factor.

[zokemon]

Originally Posted by Inverness

Zero I don't think you understand how the function is working.

I understand it perfectly. I'm just explaining why it's not working for him, that's all.

[xXziroXx]

Originally Posted by zokemon

I understand it perfectly. I'm just explaining why it's not working for him, that's all.

From the way you explained it, you don't understand it. And it is working for me, I have two posts saying it does.

[zokemon]

Originally Posted by xXziroXx

From the way you explained it, you don't understand it. And it is working for me, I have two posts saying it does.

...

Honestly, did you even read what I said? I know it is working for you. I was explaining why your first method was not working for you. I have perfect understanding of loadfolder() and am not arguing how it should and shouldn't work. I was simply pointing out the flaws in your original post as to why it wouldn't work for you.

[xXziroXx]

Originally Posted by zokemon

I was simply pointing out the flaws in your original post as to why it wouldn't work for you.

Honestly, why? Issue was "solved", and I still request the feature as I find it quite useful for other things. No need to point out things after they've been solved, man.

[[email protected]]

Originally Posted by xXziroXx

However, I reckon this could still prove a useful function to list what folders there are. No?

using loadfolder correctly gives the same result

[Inverness]

Originally Posted by [email protected]

using loadfolder correctly gives the same result

loadfolder() can also give you 20,000 results when you only have 4 subfolders.

[[email protected]]

Originally Posted by Inverness

loadfolder() can also give you 20,000 results when you only have 4 subfolders.

oh..