Unixmad, hi, nice to see you. I understand that you don't like to see this kind of discussion on the board, but what other option do we have? I sent you a PM a few days ago and you still haven't read it. How are we supposed to voice our concerns?
Contrary to what you may think, we're not doing this as a way to attack you. Some of us feel a little bitter, but that's just a secondary matter. We're doing this because we want the board to be moderated properly. In essence, our goal is the same as yours: A happy, well-managed community which will complement the game itself.
Sure, complaining will create some short-term, temporary hostility. But isn't that better than a long, drawn-out dissatisfaction?
Quote:
Originally posted by Milkdude99
In this case I disagree with your assessment, to bring in an outsider who knows nothing about the game also doesn't know any of the problems with it and why sometimes people do what they do, even if it is illegal on the Board.
|
You didn't really express yourself very clearly here. R0bin's story is pertinent, because it's almost identical to the situation here. Ignoring the problem may eventually make things less hectic, but it won't be any kind of solution.
Quote:
The biggest problem is that most on here will not accept Graal as a Commercial game and still try to treat it as a "Free Game".
|
Um. On the contrary, the problem is that they don't think it's professional enough. This isn't about strictness, it's about uneven moderation and illogical rulings.
Quote:
It is not here for personal flame wars and people who want to complain about every little thing.
|
"Every little thing"? Other than you two (and the people I banned, obviously) people rarely complained about my work. It was certainly never on the scale that the new supermods have achieved. What's the difference? Simple: The new supermods are making mistakes, and making the board a less fun environment.
Now, I'm not saying we should flame them for this. I'm not saying we should hunt them down and crucify them. We know that Unixmad isn't going to remove them (it's a matter of pride now), so the next best thing is to educate them. They don't understand the rules, so we explain them. All we ask in return is that they listen, and allow themselves to be taught. So far we haven't seen that.
Quote:
Before you complain about the Forums, ask yourself "whom have I tried to help today?" "Am I part of the problem or part of the solution?"
|
Would ignoring the problem make me part of the solution? When you were dissatisfied with my performance as supermod, did you ignore it? Whom did you help on all those days? You complained both privately and publically, you have no right to condemn others for doing the same.
Quote:
If you concentrate effort more on helping and less on complaining then you may find this Forum taking a change for the better and be a happier place to be on and post.
|
Being nice to everybody won't magically turn the moderators into competent people. Their mistakes and their laziness are real problems, and they need to be fixed. Your suggestion would merely give them free reign to moderate as poorly as before.
Quote:
Originally posted by protagonist
How do you make someone look bad? By attacking them.
|
Is that the only way? You're not stupid, don't pretend to be.
Quote:
What is against the rules? Flaming.
|
Incorrect.
Quote:
Originally posted by Darlene159
No, what I meant by "mega quotes" is someone who had about 4 quotes in one post, with no input from the member at all, only the 4 quotes.
|
Why do you consider that spam? More to the point, why do you excuse the lazier version where they quote only one person?