Future ETs? - Page 11

seanthien · #**151** 03-24-2009, 03:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

i agree 100%. infact, everystaff member should be over 16 so that they atleast have a bit of maturity, unless proven otherwise.

No, just no.That's far from being right. People mature at different rates. Age doesn't realy matter too much. It just so happens people judge maturity by your age, though that's not how it realy works.

I've met 12-13 year olds that can act more mature then a 18 year old. You'll never even guess he/she is that young.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow5596321

I still dunno why Jesse would fire all the ETs because they didn't host for what? A week or two?

If Jesse keeps thinking that events will keep Zone alive, it won't.

Jesse should have they crawling on their knees begging for events.

MiniOne · #**152** 03-24-2009, 09:04 AM

Remember when we barely had any events? Maybe once every month or so, even the little events weren't hosted this often, everyone was fine with it. I know people who are young and at the same time mature.

How old do you believe I am?

muupig · #**153** 03-24-2009, 02:53 PM

Actually, I am 7+1

RevolutionJS · #**154** 03-24-2009, 04:48 PM

Jesper · #**155** 03-24-2009, 05:28 PM

Why we need to be 16+ ?

Look at Nataxo, she was hired when she was NOT 16. And look at her, she's the best ET in 2008 on Zone.

muupig · #**156** 03-24-2009, 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevolutionJS

17?

7+1=8

Liberated · #**157** 03-24-2009, 08:46 PM

im
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1= uhm??
i think the way the event were being hosted before were fine, because there was a better community we actually played zone the way it was ment to be, no laming, just normal iricia, taking bases and huge fights at b1. Now with that gone, people need events. It also reduced the ammount of RPs and BPs around because only one of these were being hosted a month. But they were permanent.

Shadow5596321 · #**158** 03-24-2009, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesper

Why we need to be 16+ ?

Look at Nataxo, she was hired when she was NOT 16. And look at her, she's the best ET in 2008 on Zone.

Hehe, that's funny.No Online Pootang4u

Elizabeth · #**159** 03-24-2009, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanthien

No, just no.That's far from being right. People mature at different rates. Age doesn't realy matter too much. It just so happens people judge maturity by your age, though that's not how it realy works.

I've met 12-13 year olds that can act more mature then a 18 year old. You'll never even guess he/she is that young.

really? because the majority of 12-13 year olds i've met on graal are immature. those over the age of 16 usually are old enough to know better, and have a bit of maturity. sure; people are mature at different rates, but by the time they're 16, their maturity rate is usually greater than the younger ages. i'd rather have an ET hosting an event that was 16 than 13. and yes, there is 12 and 13 year olds that are more mature than 16 year olds, that's why i said,

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

unless proven otherwise.

doyouskate · #**160** 03-24-2009, 09:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

really? because the majority of 12-13 year olds i've met on graal are immature.

that's because you play on un mostly.

Elizabeth · #**161** 03-24-2009, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doyouskate

that's because you play on un mostly.

mostly, but i do play other servers, including era and zone, and once in a blue moon i'll log on graal kingdoms.

Donark · #**162** 03-24-2009, 09:53 PM

I think a couple of Zone's ets are under 16. Not sure though, I am and I think pimp and shadow are but I might be wrong.

seanthien · #**163** 03-25-2009, 02:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

really? because the majority of 12-13 year olds i've met on graal are immature. those over the age of 16 usually are old enough to know better, and have a bit of maturity. sure; people are mature at different rates, but by the time they're 16, their maturity rate is usually greater than the younger ages. i'd rather have an ET hosting an event that was 16 than 13. and yes, there is 12 and 13 year olds that are more mature than 16 year olds, that's why i said,

You can't expel that age group from havng a chance because others that are his age aren't mature. Besides, people can lie about their age, it isn't that hard.

jkool666 · #**164** 03-25-2009, 02:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shadow5596321

I still dunno why Jesse would fire all the ETs because they didn't host for what? A week or two?

If Jesse keeps thinking that events will keep Zone alive, it won't.

1. No, you don't know why I fired a few ETs. Lol.
2. LOL @ "A week or two". I'm glad you've checked the logs

.
3. Where did you draw this conclusion from? That I think events will keep Zone alive?
Zone is pretty dead at the moment, clearly they don't keep it alive. Events only give the server a temporary playercount boost. SOLID updates are needed for a lengthy playercount boost ;P.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

really? because the majority of 12-13 year olds i've met on graal are immature.

I second this, and no one can really argue against it. The majority of people worldwide ages 12-13 are immature.

I definetly factor age into becoming an ET. I probably wouldn't hire someone 12, Zone Staff positions require you to deal with PG+13 Language xD.

Elizabeth · #**165** 03-25-2009, 02:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanthien

You can't expel that age group from havng a chance because others that are his age aren't mature. Besides, people can lie about their age, it isn't that hard.

however, the job comes with rights, rights come with responsibility, and responsibility comes with maturity.

i have a feeling this quote is going to be used some more in this thread,

Quote:

Originally Posted by Elizabeth

unless proven otherwise.