Graal Advertising - Page 3

WhiteDragon · #1 01-22-2009, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx

No it's not, look on their website - they are promoting their servers, says nothing about Graal being a game.

I think you are just arguing about semantics. My point was that CyberJouers markets "playing", and that most people are here to "play".

Whether it be a series of games, a game portal, or a game.

Either way, that wasn't at all the point of my post, I was just trying to point out I am writing under that analysis of CyberJouers' current marketing strategy.

MiniOne · #2 01-26-2009, 11:25 AM

I would like to mention that you guys are going off topic by arguing about what kind of service graal is (game, engine or whatever you guys said) This thread was made to talk about the advertisement of Graal which would greatly help, even if it was just some words and a picture on some random game site, even the smallest ads to attract any amount of players is good and if people want to put their own time into it they can, not as if anyone has been forced upon to do this. Right?

If Stefan and his team are too lazy to make advertisements for their own game then its their problem because it will cause them to earn less and have a lower player count which isn't our problem (if we don't want to help then why have it as one of our problems?) though it may affect us in many ways, with the server eventually going down but it isn't our fault (because we decided not to contribute our own little parts into a enjoyable game, engine whatever it is) but if we can contribute in our own ways to helping the game then why not? (it isn't our responsibility but we should still contribute to a game which we all have enjoyed.)

Anyway I'm saying that Graal can be advertised by us as much as it can be by Stefan and his team, it isn't neither their responsibility nor ours but a choice we make to help benefit a once great game which can be made great again with contributions from both us and stefan's team.

As for the website it should be fixed and merged together to show Graal Gold Services as the main attraction along with the playerworlds and being able to develop in the background as a bonus you get with playing Graal and even the crappy little pixel characters may suck and look like ulgy pieces of ****s it won't matter it just depends on how you decide to show it, you can make crappy little pixels look good by adding them to certain situations and using your imaginations a bit, I would be more then happy to contribute to a new website picture if wanted.

TheSpude_P2P · #3 02-02-2009, 03:42 AM

This is all really good! Too bad unixmad and Stefan and whoever else don't care! They just make you pay to work and make servers for their own benefit. Everyone who develops and works for a server is a slave! Muahahaha! If I had it my way all player owned servers would be free and all servers developed by the games creators would quite possibly be actual good servers. Oh, and yes I would give lifetime playerworld access! (But of course the servers created by graalonline would be considered gold servers so you would have to pay for gold. AND THEY WOULD BE GOOD SERVERS! = D)

Stephen · #4 02-02-2009, 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpude_P2P

This is all really good! Too bad unixmad and Stefan and whoever else don't care! They just make you pay to work and make servers for their own benefit. Everyone who develops and works for a server is a slave! Muahahaha! If I had it my way all player owned servers would be free and all servers developed by the games creators would quite possibly be actual good servers. Oh, and yes I would give lifetime playerworld access! (But of course the servers created by graalonline would be considered gold servers so you would have to pay for gold. AND THEY WOULD BE GOOD SERVERS! = D)

And then we would all join hands, in a circle of peace which encompasses the globe.

rite?

maximus_asinus · #5 02-02-2009, 04:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpude_P2P

If I had it my way all player owned servers would be free and all servers developed by the games creators would quite possibly be actual good servers. Oh, and yes I would give lifetime playerworld access! (But of course the servers created by graalonline would be considered gold servers so you would have to pay for gold. AND THEY WOULD BE GOOD SERVERS! = D)

Before Graal went full P2P this was the system in place. Gold servers were developed by Graal Online, the others were Classic (free). Of course there were other perks to being Gold (no wait times on certain servers to log in, and Gold servers had access to certain script commands not available to anyone else). Too bad this wasn't enough to keep them afloat.

TheSpude_P2P · #6 02-02-2009, 03:50 AM

Only if GraalOnline agrees to work and create the "join hands" gani. But that might be too much work for them. : [

TheSpude_P2P · #7 02-07-2009, 02:32 AM

How did Runescape get so popular? we must learn from them!

CABAL49 · #8 02-07-2009, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSpude_P2P

How did Runescape get so popular? we must learn from them!

First, you are not allowed to mention MMORPG's on the Graal Forums. Second, Runescape sucks, I had to say it. But really, I have no idea. I got bored for life after 30 minutes. Maybe we need to make Graal look bigger that it actually is. For example: "Hey that server has a player count of over 80, I am going to check this out." Hooked on Kingdoms for life.

Rufus · #9 02-07-2009, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49

First, you are not allowed to mention MMORPG's on the Graal Forums. Second, Runescape sucks, I had to say it. But really, I have no idea. I got bored for life after 30 minutes. Maybe we need to make Graal look bigger that it actually is. For example: "Hey that server has a player count of over 80, I am going to check this out." Hooked on Kingdoms for life.

Take out the playercounts and replace them with population status "High" "Medium" "Low" and adjust as more players (or less LOL) join!!!!

TheSpude_P2P · #10 02-07-2009, 02:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus

Take out the playercounts and replace them with population status "High" "Medium" "Low" and adjust as more players (or less LOL) join!!!!

thats pretty smart LOL...it's like...so smart...people wouldn't be able to tell if the game is half-dead or not. OMG!

TheSpude_P2P · #11 02-07-2009, 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49

First, you are not allowed to mention MMORPG's on the Graal Forums. Second, Runescape sucks, I had to say it. But really, I have no idea. I got bored for life after 30 minutes. Maybe we need to make Graal look bigger that it actually is. For example: "Hey that server has a player count of over 80, I am going to check this out." Hooked on Kingdoms for life.

Oh and I agree that game does suck. But it's pretty popular for a crappy game. If Graal is so good why isn't it popular? D:

jkool666 · #12 02-08-2009, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CABAL49

Second, Runescape sucks, I had to say it.

Not in a deomocratic society.

cptmetal · #13 02-08-2009, 08:46 PM

i'm an olbie of Zodiac, and this is my opinion.

i remember when era zodiac AND un each had a playercount of 140.........then lifetime classic was removed, and the graal234123423 invasion began....

now if a server reaches 100players that's amazing.

something has to be done, either by the players or by the global staff.

it doesn't matter who, just that it gets done.