Treaded like dirt :/

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by Snakeandy7
2 time by buying accounts?

He didn't buy the accounts, he shared them.

It's like the inphketed kid, he was globally banned, changed his account didnt get banned, o wait, wan did

Inphektid was banned multiple times for evading. Then he changed, so he was allowed to return. In contrast, Wan is still as immature and obnoxious as ever.

[superb]

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

Inphektid was banned multiple times for evading. Then he changed, so he was allowed to return. In contrast, Wan is still as immature and obnoxious as ever.

This is still debatable I think, but you make the decisions here so there's no use in arguing over it.

[Snakeandy7]

Originally posted by superb


This is still debatable I think, but you make the decisions here so there's no use in arguing over it.

Is that because what ever he say's goes?

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by superb
This is still debatable I think, but you make the decisions here so there's no use in arguing over it.

It was a close decision. I could've banned him, but it would serve no useful purpose. He hasn't broken any rules since returning, so the ban wouldn't protect the forum users from any misconduct. It would only reduce the number of active users. I thought about imposing some kind of lesser punishment, but there aren't any grounds for that other than spite.

[HoudiniMan]

There's hope for Kai yet

[superb]

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


It was a close decision. I could've banned him, but it would serve no useful purpose. He hasn't broken any rules since returning, so the ban wouldn't protect the forum users from any misconduct. It would only reduce the number of active users. I thought about imposing some kind of lesser punishment, but there aren't any grounds for that other than spite.

Rule enforcement is not a useful purpose? Maybe I'm just being too objective here.

[syltburk]

Wan have done ban evasion by using snakeandy7 acount

[marcoR]

Is there no reasoning in Graal, Or have I gone insane?
I hardly ever meet reasonable people anymore, and when they're reasonable someone comes along and tells them they're stupid, or starts a flame war, a "flame war" whoever began that should be shot... honestly people, have you not a shred of reason, btw, this doesn't apply to all of you.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally posted by superb
Rule enforcement is not a useful purpose? Maybe I'm just being too objective here.

Rules restrict users, not moderators. We're not obligated to enforce them at all times, or punish all incursions. In 90% of occasions I would've issued another ban, but I felt that Thallen had truly become a different person (at least with regard to the forums) and thus wasn't the user I originally banned. Would it improve the forums if I rebanned him?

Originally posted by syltburk
Wan have done ban evasion by using snakeandy7 acount

Proof?

[superb]

Originally posted by Kaimetsu


Rules restrict users, not moderators. We're not obligated to enforce them at all times, or punish all incursions. In 90% of occasions I would've issued another ban, but I felt that Thallen had truly become a different person (at least with regard to the forums) and thus wasn't the user I originally banned. Would it improve the forums if I rebanned him?

Truthfully, no it probably wouldn't. I'm just being too anal about it I guess. Like I said, I'm being too black and white. This is one of those oh so controversial grey areas. Anyway, you're the mod and I respect your decisions. I was pretty much just saying I would have handled it differently if it was my decision. That's not to say that I don't think you made the right choice. Now that I think about it from a less objective viewpoint I can understand clearly why you chose to let him stay. This is why you are the right person for your job.

[Snakeandy7]

Wait a minute, your saying I'm Wan, Grow up, wan's to busy to post on the forum's, he dosnt want to come back on how you treated him.
So i dont think he would post. Now stop throwing unusefull evidence around saying Wan's posted, Grow ****ing up, Now i'm mad, accusing wan of something he never did, and you call your self a mod, kai get the fact's please.
Pathetic
I know what's coming, so is this thread, so ive saved you from writing it down, just quote it.

[Darlene159]

Originally posted by Snakeandy7
Wait a minute, your saying I'm Wan, Grow up, wan's to busy to post on the forum's, he dosnt want to come back on how you treated him.
So i dont think he would post. Now stop throwing unusefull evidence around saying Wan's posted, Grow ****ing up, Now i'm mad, accusing wan of something he never did, and you call your self a mod, kai get the fact's please.
Pathetic
I know what's coming, so is this thread, so ive saved you from writing it down, just quote it.

lol, Kai isnt the one who said you are Wan, syltburk did

[Googi]

Kaimetsu has gotten quotes removed from sigs for other people aswell. It's not like he's using his staff power corruptly because he's doing it for himself this time.

[Snakeandy7]

Originally posted by Googi
Kaimetsu has gotten quotes removed from sigs for other people aswell. It's not like he's using his staff power corruptly because he's doing it for himself this time.

And they call you dumb .
I'm not botherd about that now, im botherd about the bull jaffer cake is making

[Googi]

Originally posted by Snakeandy7
I'm not botherd about that now, im botherd about the bull jaffer cake is making

Oh.

I think that's mostly about whether or not you are account sharing, or that you used to.