PM History

[KuJi]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Is that the 'rational scrutiny' level?



Or the kid just gives somebody the account information directly.

Again: The only difference is that the PM could be intercepted by an honorable staff member, making that method less efficient.



It's a stupid example. We'd actually prefer the account information to be reported, since there's less chance of it resulting in damage.

All I am saying is that the information can be given to the wrong hands.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by KuJi

All I am saying is that the information can be given to the wrong hands.

Duh. But how is it different to the current situation?

[KuJi]

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu

Duh. But how is it different to the current situation?

I was just trying to show an example of how the button MAY damage graal.

[Velox Cruentus]

Bad example:

A good example would be perhaps two people talking about how X staff isn't doing their job (being corrupt). Both of them are in the conversation, and it gets pretty awful (Convo),
Then one reports, gets the other banned.

[Kaimetsu]

Originally Posted by KuJi

I was just trying to show an example of how the button MAY damage graal.

Dude, are you even listening?

Any communication medium can be used in damaging Graal. But if there's already a medium that can be more easily abused then it's a moot point. There's no net reduction in security.