The banning continued

[--Chris--]

Rping out a king = unorderly and illogical. If GK took RPing that drastically then all RPing fundimentals would be screwed unless a policy is created on exactly how to go about doing things, as it is one does not exist so everything is flexibly flawed and it's stupid to think your actions are just Padren. Have you even considered outside playerwise factors such as Stefan likely having to add debug access for the new leaders often?

"I agree the bug should be fixed, but there should be a way for people to rate a ruler, if ruler gets < 10% approval 3 months in a row, then they'd be removed. Then lance would have been out a long long long time beforehand. "

Yes and there _COULD_ also be a created system from the top of anyone's head even while drunk or beaten senseless (or even both) that can positively benefit them. Woah! - you're such a genious! Also that "rate a ruler" idea is very flawed and can be easily manipulated/abused. Do you really think that out of everybody else on GK you are the best choice for a leader? Your actions certainly have proven against it thus far ;o

Wow...not only why this is unethical briefly explained above but you also see where Lance's point stands legally and actions have been taken against others which have done the same. You shouldn't be an exception. Lance rightfully deserves his kingship back kthz