Where is the logic in this?

[Spark910]

Originally posted by Milkdude99
Was he a Co-Manager or an asst Manager ? Co Managers have the SAME rights to the server as the Manager mainly because that is what they are BOTH Managers with equal powers and rights to a server NOT a step down. The Asst Manager is a step down NOT a Co Manager. Let me put it this way , Managers including Co Managers "own" and run the server everyone else is an employee of this 2 people and work for them , a Co Manager does not work for the Manager because they are the same but BOTH work for the server. If a Manager leaves for some reason the Co Manager is then the sole Manager and is up to him/her if they desire to have another Co Manager or not. If this was done any other way then you people screwed up and don't know the difference between a Co Manager and an Asst Manager.

Im aware that co-manager and manager are the same. The 'co' part implies that it your partner, your 'company'. However on graal it seems to mean less than a manager, which is why it gets confusing. I personally would say that co is the same, while managers may say he/she is above the co-manager, I will need to iron this out when I return, to stop things like this from happening.

And yeah, thats post
I was trying to keep a track of things, but no. I have to now go manually over every single playerworld to keep a track of managers, and to find half the time about 10% of PWs have totaly switched around with managers. I got things like

If a manager wishes to leave, then he will leave. A time limit of staying manager? What a joke! This isn't any legal contract, they aren't paid, and they have no reason to follow such rules.

But no. Now we end up where we are, with some PWs with managers just quitting, E.g: Maloria a while back, and there are fights for the manager spot. I was trying to sort things out, but it didnt work, so there x)x

And..

They didn't choose Okilian because most staff thinks he does nothing to help the server in anyway.

So who is this message from, these posts.. I take it its the co-manager? And your complaining that a GP Chief was put above you? Well heres what I think, if this is Ok's msg being posted:

A GP Chief shouldnt go straight to manager, does this person even develop at all, and can he/she help with UN development? Even if he/she can, its not fair that he/she skips the co-manager. So I think for now its best to put Ok as Manager, and see how it goes.