Elk's Image Thread

[Fulg0reSama]

Originally Posted by foxstar70

I am voicing entirely my opinion, I'm not going to sugarcoat anything and just be completely honest. I liked Elk's pixelpainting too, but I found it disturbing how he'd made it a pixel art piece, rather than an actual painting. It would have much greater use if it were the latter.

To answer your hostile questions:

1. Why should I have to prove I'm somewhat better, to justify my objective statements?
2. Because there's a fine line between complimenting someone's good work, and blindly kissing his ass.

Take it or leave it, if you can enjoy it - fine. But in my opinion it is a waste of his artistical talents, and how pixel-art should stay in the past where it should be. It only existed this way because computers couldn't handle the amount of colours they can in this day and age, so why limit yourself?

1. You're not better, I asked you to provide a better piece of work, not that you could do better.
2. I merely said out of his own work, It was his best and that I looked forward to seeing it completed, how is this kissing his ass? I'm curious to know how that is, unless you just want to admit you're just antagonizing with this angle here.

As for the fact it's not a painting is a pretty petty critique as well.
Pixel-art is a fine practice, as well as limiting your colors, otherwise his work could potentially look like this



Your opinion is your opinion, but my opinion is that your opinion is terrible.

[foxstar70]

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama

1. You're not better, I asked you to provide a better piece of work, not that you could do better.

Stopped reading right there. Sorting to ad hominems now? Shouldn't have expected any better from this community.

But just to add; I could do better in my own way, but that's besides the points because the views I stated on pixel-art were entirely from an objective viewpoint.

[InfamousPride]

Originally Posted by foxstar70

Shouldn't have expected any better from this community.

Then why do you stick around, obviously all you do on these forums is start conflicts. You never provide any sort of useful information in any forum post I have seen, all you do is attack the original poster.

What, may I ask, has got you so butthurt?

[Felix_Xenophobe]

Originally Posted by foxstar70

Stopped reading right there. Sorting to ad hominems now? Shouldn't have expected any better from this community.

But just to add; I could do better in my own way, but that's besides the points because the views I stated on pixel-art were entirely from an objective viewpoint.

maddy mad madders

[Elk]

Originally Posted by foxstar70

Stopped reading right there. Sorting to ad hominems now? Shouldn't have expected any better from this community.

But just to add; I could do better in my own way, but that's besides the points because the views I stated on pixel-art were entirely from an objective viewpoint.

My objective viewpoint is, as LAT/GFX, you are as bad as you are a human

Originally Posted by foxstar70

how do you like this it isnt done yet but i am working on it

Originally Posted by foxstar70

click on the sig to

[Galdor]

Originally Posted by Elk

[Cubical]

Originally Posted by Elk

My objective viewpoint is, as LAT/GFX, you are as bad as you are a human

those are from 2001.. 12 years ago, i'm sure his development skills have gotten better since then

[Elk]

Originally Posted by Cubical

those are from 2001.. 12 years ago, i'm sure his development skills have gotten better since then

as if, since he hasnt been that active

[FaLLChiLD]

Originally Posted by Elk

as if, since he hasnt been that active

Could just be his lame attitude but I had similar thoughts.

[DeCeaseD]

Originally Posted by Elk

My objective viewpoint is, as LAT/GFX, you are as bad as you are a human

Ouchhhh fox, get burnt much.. ? D: