Shaded Legend

[Loakey_P2P]

well they wern't the ones we wanted to you to use . we were hoping for a more recent copy with the bigger gmap and some of the gs2 conversion done but that's not what we got .

Originally Posted by ff7chocoboknight

I hope it doesn't come back looking the same as it did last time, or the times before those. Make a new server, damn it.

shouldn't you be idling on your dusty covered server that should have shut down 8 year's ago but didn't cause you guys didn't have the common sense to shut it down before it died .

[xnervNATx]

Originally Posted by Loakey_P2P

shouldn't you be idling on your dusty covered server that should have shut down 8 year's ago but didn't cause you guys didn't have the common sense to shut it down before it died .

nice one there, but if i had to compare Classic to Shaded Legend, i would say that Shaded Legend is not going anywhere while Classic is.

[ffcmike]

Originally Posted by Loakey_P2P

shouldn't you be idling on your dusty covered server that should have shut down 8 year's ago but didn't cause you guys didn't have the common sense to shut it down before it died .

You mean the server which we've actually bothered to come up with a new plan for, much of that plan having since been executed rather than remaining theoretical (feel free to see Youtube videos of actual new content), got rid of the old/out-dated/inefficient systems and re-coded everything from scratch (including fully custom systems as opposed to default) with a much higher amount of abstraction/organisation/optimisation, and the server which could very easily be on the list if we wanted to asap, but we'd rather take our time giving it a greater level of completion than take reputation for granted?

It's funny that you choose to take an unprovoked swipe at Classic, because there's a hell of a lot you could learn from it if you want SL to become more than just a re-hash of an old server that died out several years before pre-wipe Classic did. And you know, taking the server off the list to redevelop it wasn't forced either, it was a choice, one that's been stuck to all along and isn't a great deal away from obtaining the fruits of its labour.

But if you feel you can resurrect a project from over half a decade ago with just "a few upgrades", then good luck to you I suppose.

[MysticX2X]

Originally Posted by ffcmike

And you know, taking the server off the list to redevelop it wasn't forced either, it was a choice, one that's been stuck to all along and isn't a great deal away from obtaining the fruits of its labour.

So I guess constant player complaints about the server didn't prompt any sort of global action at all, right? Doesn't matter that you wanted to keep it UC.

Laura will make excellent walktrouts for classic

[ffcmike]

Originally Posted by MysticX2X

So I guess constant player complaints about the server didn't prompt any sort of global action at all, right?

It had little/nothing to do with player complaints as has already been verified multiple times, but this is not the place to discuss it, nor is it really worth discussing in length now anyway.

[nightslayer317]

Originally Posted by MysticX2X

Laura will make excellent walktrouts for classic

Is a walktrout a type of fish?

[ff7chocoboknight]

Originally Posted by Loakey_P2P

well they wern't the ones we wanted to you to use . we were hoping for a more recent copy with the bigger gmap and some of the gs2 conversion done but that's not what we got .



shouldn't you be idling on your dusty covered server that should have shut down 8 year's ago but didn't cause you guys didn't have the common sense to shut it down before it died .

When are you going to learn how to type, Mr. Ronso?