Ruins: Hirings!

[maximus_asinus]

I think all server owners should be globally banned if their server goes under. I am tired of people arguing over "that was on [shut down server], please delete it."

[Soala]

Originally Posted by maximus_asinus

I think all server owners should be globally banned if their server goes under. I am tired of people arguing over "that was on [shut down server], please delete it."

I kinda agree, but I know what Elk is going to do with that shield for example, so I will remove it because it is still his property. He let me use so much stuff from Crystia already, I only needed it for ganis. I will still use the templates, but not the placeholders as he requested.

[kia345]

Originally Posted by Soala

I kinda agree, but I know what Elk is going to do with that shield for example, so I will remove it because it is still his property

But it's not his property

[Elk]

Originally Posted by kia345

But it's not his property

It is it was uploaded on Crystia first.

Anyways, he can buy the rights to use it.

Originally Posted by salesman

If Crystia isn't using them, why not pass on the rights to Ruins? Making them redo their placeholders is just going to waste time. Ruins looks promising enough, and Soala seems to want to see the project through, so why not help him out by letting them use your dead server's graphics?

Who said Crystia isnt using the Shield? You're outdated, my server is nothing like dead just because I'm working behind the scenes, rofl...

Originally Posted by Crono

because elk likes (to be an) ass ;p

prob cuz they clashed when they used to work together

Who?

[fowlplay4]

Originally Posted by Elk

It is it was uploaded on Crystia first.

Graal's (Stefan/unixmad) property actually, so selling it would probably be illegal.

[xenow]

Originally Posted by fowlplay4

Graal's (Stefan/unixmad) property actually, so selling it would probably be illegal.

No way to check if it is actually their're property. Same as uploading the windows logo on a graal server,
who says Stefan/Unixmad can sue Microsoft for that ? Even if it says so in the terms of agreement.

[kia345]

Originally Posted by xenow

No way to check if it is actually their're property. Same as uploading the windows logo on a graal server,
who says Stefan/Unixmad can sue Microsoft for that ? Even if it says so in the terms of agreement.

Elk doesn't have his images copyrighted. Graal does not grant ownership to anything uploaded, so it defaults back to belonging to them. If someone uploaded an already copyrighted image such as M$'s logo, they could sue Graal (because obviously, they had rights to it first).

If for some zany and bizarre reason Elk did have them copyrighted, he would be in violation of the ToC.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by Elk

Who?

you and soala