Quote:
Originally Posted by CABAL49
Still had more medals. We also have the most advanced military, that tends to help in global debates.
Can't help but notice that those are all nations that were once owned by England. So you can't really say those people really jumped at the opportunity to be more like the British.
|
Go see if anyone cares about your bronze's over golds.

And when did military come into sport?
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormYs
Why are you so ignorant, even your king admits it yet you go against his words. As I said in the first line of my post: "Seeing as that war was almost a all out of war".
With this I am saying that we both didn't have our full army but there where plenty of dusty online, I know you guys didn't have sean online. But we didn't have Jcs, Alex, Romain, John online yet we won.
You said:
"How one can conclude their superiority from a self-hosted Core whilst unable to be consistent in previous cores"
My answer:
We both had a week to assemble our forces, meaning that we almost used all of our army (goes for both kingdoms). About the previous cores, anyone could of win a match if they had a sufficient amount of players online while the other kingdoms hardly had any online. Meaning that this doesn't show how great your kingdom is, but if there is a scheduled match announced early enough to have both kingdoms mobilize their army then we can start talking about the greatness of a kingdom because they will both try to gather as many people as possible for the war. So utilizing everything they can.
|
>Yea we had our full army of 8/9 players

>John won't fight for you, Romain counts for nothing.
>It was evident that one Kingom took it alot more seriously 22:9 were the numbers?
>Also, if i remember most of my Cores, pre-monthlongevent, there were quite a decent number on either side, with several Kingdoms going at it, it's true one could easily lame wins, but Dustari had a very superior destroyed cores record. One can only assume we've fended off several kingdoms at one time.