4 Years of being stagnant

[Crono]

Originally Posted by -Ramirez-

I've also explained this. Please go back and read, as I don't want to type it again.

I've read the thread, but I haven't seen any mention of how your hit detection is "identical" to the default hit detection. If you can script a hit detection I'm sure you have the ability to copy and paste or even quote what you've apparently explained.

[-Ramirez-]

Originally Posted by Crono

I've read the thread, but I haven't seen any mention of how your hit detection is "identical" to the default hit detection. If you can script a hit detection I'm sure you have the ability to copy and paste or even quote what you've apparently explained.

It makes no difference to me whether or not you believe me. If you're truly interested in the information, you'll go back and look for it on your own.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by -Ramirez-

It makes no difference to me whether or not you believe me. If you're truly interested in the information, you'll go back and look for it on your own.

Haha, that's what I thought.

[-Ramirez-]

Originally Posted by Crono

Haha, that's what I thought.

That's very typical of someone who's throwing emotion and ego into their posts. You're clearly not interested in the information that you claim to want.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by -Ramirez-

That's very typical of someone who's throwing emotion and ego into their posts. You're clearly not interested in the information that you claim to want.

Originally Posted by Crono

How is it identical?

Originally Posted by Crono

I've read the thread, but I haven't seen any mention of how your hit detection is "identical" to the default hit detection. If you can script a hit detection I'm sure you have the ability to copy and paste or even quote what you've apparently explained.

[-Ramirez-]

Originally Posted by Crono

You're assuming that you've read it properly and the information doesn't exist. Clearly you haven't, because you're wrong. I'm not doing the work for you.

[Crono]

Originally Posted by -Ramirez-

You're assuming that you've read it properly and the information doesn't exist. Clearly you haven't, because you're wrong. I'm not doing the work for you.

If I'm apparently wrong then why can't you support your claim? I have read through your posts and you have not explained it at all. Stop being a child and either quote what you've apparently explained or stop 'bsing' all together.