Atrius is back!

Scrimps · #1 06-09-2008, 07:07 AM

Atrius is back, And better than ever!

Current sever name: "Wasteland" waiting for stefan to switch it back to "Atrius"

So if anyone wants to start playing again. Please try to log on sever "Wasteland" for the next couple days till it is switched back!

Me and Mike desided to bring back atruis.

Were hiring all devs!

Contact me on here or on player im always on.

Thanks goodbye,
-Scrimps (Manager)

cbk1994 · #2 06-09-2008, 07:13 AM

Look dude, you can't manage two servers and have them both succeed, unless everyone else does the work for you.

Also, do you have permission from Atrius' original owner?

Tigairius · #3 06-09-2008, 07:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

Also, do you have permission from Atrius' original owner?

No

cbk1994 · #4 06-09-2008, 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tigairius

No

Wasn't it TheJames?

I figured there was no way he got permission.

Mursle · #5 06-09-2008, 08:43 AM

To be honest, I am rather sick and tired of all these revival's of old servers,

also when Atrius has came back, I don't know if it was just me or anything but I did not see any real updates and it was basicly the same sorta thing as before.

cbk1994 · #6 06-09-2008, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mursle

To be honest, I am rather sick and tired of all these revival's of old servers,

also when Atrius has came back, I don't know if it was just me or anything but I did not see any real updates and it was basicly the same sorta thing as before.

That's because they most likely took an old backup, uploaded it, and expect credit.

Same thing SoG revival attempts have done.

Darklux · #7 06-09-2008, 11:37 AM

There finally should be an easier set of rules so even the dumbest kid can see that its illegal to steal playerworlds =/

Crow · #8 06-09-2008, 12:05 PM

"We're back, *****es!"

What a nice way to announce that a playerworld which failed to succeed for several years is back. Again.

Mursle · #9 06-09-2008, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crow

"We're back, *****es!"

What a nice way to announce that a playerworld which failed to succeed for several years is back. Again.

lawl, I don't see why people try to revive a playerworld unless there is good intent and that there is an obvious good staff team which are willing to update the server and whatnot.

Bell · #10 06-09-2008, 05:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darklux

There finally should be an easier set of rules so even the dumbest kid can see that its illegal to steal playerworlds =/

The rules are simple, no permission from the server owner, no content rights given. Not everyone is willing to take no for an answer though it seems.

Scrimps · #11 06-09-2008, 05:45 PM

#This is TheJames leaving a message for everyone
#Atrius has moved to Wasteland for good due to managementship.
#Scrimps has taken over as the new Owner/Manager
#Wish him luck and try to obey his orders.
#Enjoy your stay here. Wasteland will shortly be named to Atrius
#-TheJames

Deas_Voice · #12 06-09-2008, 06:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

#This is TheJames leaving a message for everyone
#Atrius has moved to Wasteland for good due to managementship.
#Scrimps has taken over as the new Owner/Manager
#Wish him luck and try to obey his orders.
#Enjoy your stay here. Wasteland will shortly be named to Atrius
#-TheJames

u should told that then they askt if u got hes promision..
this makes u look like u lie

Mursle · #13 06-09-2008, 06:23 PM

Firstly you could have just made up that conversation between you two and secondly you sound as though you will make a great difference with TheJames' hammydown server.

I don't see why you don't either make your own server or just stick to the one that you are working on just now.

In my opinion managing/owning two servers is unfesable.

TheFisherman · #14 06-09-2008, 06:54 PM

It looks pretty ugly anyways, good luck!

cbk1994 · #15 06-09-2008, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bell

The rules are simple, no permission from the server owner, no content rights given. Not everyone is willing to take no for an answer though it seems.

Yet you refused to remove the Sands of Glory content several months ago from a revival attempt.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

#This is TheJames leaving a message for everyone
#Atrius has moved to Wasteland for good due to managementship.
#Scrimps has taken over as the new Owner/Manager
#Wish him luck and try to obey his orders.
#Enjoy your stay here. Wasteland will shortly be named to Atrius
#-TheJames

The only reason I can see that that may possibly be from TheJames is that there are few typos, though I don't know where managementship came from

Sinkler · #16 06-09-2008, 07:17 PM

Let Atrius fix itself. It could do it, but patience is the key!

cbk1994 · #17 06-09-2008, 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sinkler

Let Atrius fix itself. It could do it, but patience is the key!

Atrius won't fix itself without a team of dedicated staff members.

Scrimps · #18 06-09-2008, 08:51 PM

We have a good staff team. That is just your thoughts. Atrius will be fully running soon!

Switch · #19 06-09-2008, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

We have a good staff team.

That's what they all say.

Quote:

That is just your thoughts.

No, That is just the truth.

cbk1994 · #20 06-09-2008, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

We have a good staff team. That is just your thoughts. Atrius will be fully running soon!

Atrius will fail unless you decide to stop managing Kriegzone. Either way, one of them, if not both, will fail unless you decide to give the owner position to someone else.

It is impossible to manage two servers.

Mursle · #21 06-09-2008, 09:40 PM

I really don't understand why thought people would want to see Atrius revived for the one millionth time.

People like you see Atrius and think oh its a good way to get on hosted status and what not, and it really bugs me. I mean why not stick with your own server and make it good.

Also like I stated before it is impossible to manage two servers; another thing Is that both are modern servers which to be frank are going to turn out mostly the same.

Mafukie · #22 06-10-2008, 01:58 AM

I don't see why people have to complain about revived server projects, they aren't even on the main list. It was an announcement saying hey we revived it, not a welcome for people to start flaming them. All the hours that go into a project, why not revive it so there aren't 84 different worthless projects going on at once that will never be complete

cbk1994 · #23 06-10-2008, 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mafukie

I don't see why people have to complain about revived server projects, they aren't even on the main list. It was an announcement saying hey we revived it, not a welcome for people to start flaming them. All the hours that go into a project, why not revive it so there aren't 84 different worthless projects going on at once that will never be complete

You're right. There are already so many projects going on; lets work on another one that failed instead of helping those that are yet to fail. This way, every server has limited developers so that it is fair

Totally agreed.

Mafukie · #24 06-10-2008, 04:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbk1994

You're right. There are already so many projects going on; lets work on another one that failed instead of helping those that are yet to fail. This way, every server has limited developers so that it is fair

Totally agreed.

QFE

TheStan · #25 06-10-2008, 05:26 AM

Atrius fails without Madj (gone), Lance (gone), and Gman (gone).

Scrimps · #26 06-10-2008, 05:41 AM

First off i will be 100% running atrius. I'm making Jay cassini Manager of kriegzone soon.

Scrimps · #27 06-10-2008, 05:48 AM

Quote:

Yet you refused to remove the Sands of Glory content several months ago from a revival attempt.

Rofl , I never had sands of glory in my life. I never even like that sever. You must have the wrong person.

cbk1994 · #28 06-10-2008, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

Rofl , I never had sands of glory in my life. I never even like that sever. You must have the wrong person.

No, you do.

Notice that I quoted Bell in that post.

I never said you did anything; I was saying how Bell refused to remove stolen content from a server.

Not everything everyone posts in a topic you start is directed at you.

Sinkler · #29 06-10-2008, 05:14 PM

Give Atrius a chance..

Atrius CAN still work if Scrimps and the rest of the staff team work as hard as they can.

BUT, if they become lazy and tired, Atrius is dead. Period.

Chompy · #30 06-10-2008, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheStan

Atrius fails without Madj (gone), Lance (gone), and Gman (gone).

here here..

DarknessShadow · #31 06-10-2008, 06:52 PM

Scrimps does not have permission to atrius
What really happened was:
Scrimps offered to BUY atrius backups
James gave him the backups
Scrimps didnt give him the money and then uploaded it on another server
He doesnt have permission for it.Atrius died months ago,let it die.

Mursle · #32 06-10-2008, 07:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarknessShadow

Scrimps does not have permission to atrius
What really happened was:
Scrimps offered to BUY atrius backups
James gave him the backups
Scrimps didnt give him the money and then uploaded it on another server
He doesnt have permission for it.Atrius died months ago,let it die.

To me all this seems shaddy and the fact that someone would be so deperate to buy backups sounds pathetic to me...

Also I don't see why buying these backups would benefit anyone because it does not sound like there would be any updates and it would be left as it is - all that for an easy ticket to hosted I guess...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarknessShadow

let it die.

True true...

Scrimps · #33 06-10-2008, 09:18 PM

Darkness , This has nuttin to do with James. This has to do with Mike (Co-Manager) of atruis. Me and him are starting it backup. James quit graal. Gave permission for Mike and me to start it up.

Chompy · #34 06-10-2008, 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

Darkness , This has nuttin to do with James. This has to do with Mike (Co-Manager) of atruis. Me and him are starting it backup. James quit graal. Gave permission for Mike and me to start it up.

Proofs or it didn't happen

Scrimps · #35 06-10-2008, 10:02 PM

Listen guys i just made this thread to tell you that Mike and me are finishing Atrius. And were hiring / looking for some new players. Sever rename is pending on stefan.

Mursle · #36 06-10-2008, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Scrimps

Listen guys i just made this thread to tell you that Mike and me are finishing Atrius. And were hiring / looking for some new players. Sever rename is pending on stefan.

You are hiring players?? thats a first

Scrimps · #37 06-10-2008, 10:36 PM

Yes were hiring.

DarknessShadow · #38 06-10-2008, 10:36 PM

I dont understand why MIKE got atrius,Mike left or got fired,Brad and Xile were there longer,Xile worked on atrius longer than TheJames did.
Just end the server,atrius doesnt need another terrible manager.

Mursle · #39 06-10-2008, 10:39 PM

The only thing that bugs me about this is that I know that you only want this because you think its an easy way to success. Atrius has been brough back too many times for my liking :P and I don't think you will do very much in this attempt that will make a huge difference.

kia345 · #40 06-10-2008, 10:44 PM

IQ test before being able to start a playerworld, then we worry about getting permission.

Problem solved.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread: