Send params to putnpc2?

[Skyld]

Originally Posted by hotrian

"join(\"someclass\");"

It should be "this.join(\"someclass\");", but what is the point in overcomplicating it when "join someclass;" is clearer in the case of putnpc2()?

[hotrian]

Originally Posted by Skyld

It should be "this.join(\"someclass\");", but what is the point in overcomplicating it when "join someclass;" is clearer in the case of putnpc2()?

why this., doesnt it already assume? Or is it instead joining the script to the script that called it or so?

@Riot
Yea? I didn't know you could pull the object of a putnpc2

[Skyld]

Originally Posted by hotrian

why this., doesnt it already assume? Or is it instead joining the script to the script that called it or so?

Because you should specify the object you're working with for clarity, and I guess easier later editing.

[hotrian]

Originally Posted by Skyld

Because you should specify the object you're working with for clarity, and I guess easier later editing.

But doesn't it already know..? Its always worked for me without it XD

[Skyld]

Originally Posted by hotrian

But doesn't it already know..? Its always worked for me without it XD

It will work, yes, but like I said, you should be clear on what you're working with, for at least clarity and consistency.