Quote:
Originally posted by Lyndzey
He has warned us 3 times. If you read his little sticky (it was stickied for a reason), it says that this is his 3rd warning. How many warnings does it take until he should be able to ban? Is it corrupt of him to ban a few people because they have ignored three of his warnings?
|
I'm not saying it's corrupt. I'm just expressing that I think it's wrong. He makes announcements that sound like he's talking to little children, and makes warnings saying we can't have a negative opinion about anything on Graal. It's hard to know when you're in a "gray area" or when you're "crossing the line".
What kind of "rule" is that anyway? What are we being warned FOR exactly? Should we just carefully examine every post we make in fear that it might upset Unixmad or a moderator that will complain to Unixmad? I can see if the posts are just generally nothing but negative with no real criticism. But nearly all the posts lately have been reasonable and I don't think everyone deserves a slap on the wrist and told to be quiet.
01-09-2004, 01:31 AM
Threaded Mode