Should P2P playerworld owners be.. paid?

[konidias]

To deatchill:

He might not have asked for it, but you can't deny the fact that if a p2p playerworld gets really popular, it's going to be bringing their company in more money.

To nastazio:

you mention 9/10 servers would be crap then.. I don't think that would be the case.. if they were crap they wouldn't be put up.. I think it would be a good idea to get a group of playerworld reviewers.. and they all review the playerworld by themself, then give it a yes or no, like a jury.. if the majority is yes, the playerworld gets in, if the majority is no, it's rejected. It would also give a better more varied opinion on a playerworld, instead of 1 or 2 people deciding it all.

Plus, people would keep non-p2p up because the requirements wouldn't be so high or something? How come so many are up right now? Way more then p2p.. I think as long as the p2p servers have to reach a certain standard, it will keep them to a limited amount. Plus you know more people DON'T have p2p accounts (judging by the amount of people on classic/other nonp2p servers) so you can get a wider audience with a nonp2p server.

Some of you are kinda putting prices in your heads it seems.. the payment could be whatever Stefan wants it to be.. even a dollar or something is better then nothing you know