A.I.M Chat about Graal Forums - Page 4

Hevaricubed · #**121** 01-09-2004, 04:46 PM

I was allowed back by angel.

It is quite apparent by my profile that i am
R0bin, and it was either tyhm or unixmad who activated this account on the boards, and they should have known that i was banned, and if they didnt, then i am hardly to blame for their ignorance.

Besides, the forums have gone to ****, and i really dont feel like coming back when this account runs out of gold in a few weeks.

D1ce2 · #**122** 01-09-2004, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hevaricubed
I was allowed back by angel.

It is quite apparent by my profile that i am
R0bin, and it was either tyhm or unixmad who activated this account on the boards, and they should have known that i was banned, and if they didnt, then i am hardly to blame for their ignorance.

Besides, the forums have gone to ****, and i really dont feel like coming back when this account runs out of gold in a few weeks.

I have got nothing else to say. Mod's breaking rules now I guess.
I'm with you about the forums.

Darlene159 · #**123** 01-09-2004, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hevaricubed
What you are doing is an example of moonie's "quote spam".

If i were you, i would simply cease to exist, and save myself the world of hurt that would come upon me after R0bin was through with me.

No, what I meant by "mega quotes" is someone who had about 4 quotes in one post, with no input from the member at all, only the 4 quotes.

D1ce2 · #**124** 01-09-2004, 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
No, what I meant by "mega quotes" is someone who had about 4 quotes in one post, with no input from the member at all, only the 4 quotes.

That's spam

Darlene159 · #**125** 01-09-2004, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by D1ce2

That's spam

exactly....

Hevaricubed · #**126** 01-09-2004, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
No, what I meant by "mega quotes" is someone who had about 4 quotes in one post, with no input from the member at all, only the 4 quotes.

Where in my post did it say "mega"?

I was talking of the spam where just a quote is posted. He was doing that, and just saying something like "Omg ownage" to accompany the quote, which in my book IS spam.

D1ce2 · #**127** 01-09-2004, 04:54 PM

O, If your on about me on that post, I was implying to robin about that being spam on what you said. I'm sorry If you meant mine was spam!

Darlene159 · #**128** 01-09-2004, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Hevaricubed

Where in my post did it say "mega"?

I was talking of the spam where just a quote is posted. He was doing that, and just saying something like "Omg ownage" to accompany the quote, which in my book IS spam.

quoted the wrong person

Anyway, the rule about not posting only quotes has been added back into the rules

syltburk · #**129** 01-09-2004, 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kaimetsu

Best guess: Me, Pickles, probably a couple of others. Not sure what he's talking about with the 'three warnings' thing, though. He certainly hasn't sent any warnings to me, and most of the threads he doesn't like are promptly deleted. How am I supposed to know if I'm one of the 'troublemakers' or just another person having legitimate posts removed?

I also think you should count me in, as i have also had an oppinon kaim

marcoR · #**130** 01-09-2004, 05:43 PM

Snip, Snip?

Darlene159 · #**131** 01-09-2004, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marcoR
Snip, Snip?

no need for spam

Quote:

I also think you should count me in, as i have also had an oppinon kaim

Opinions arent against the rules, for the millionth time, it is the way you give those opinions.

Quote:

Mod's breaking rules now I guess.

If you think the mods are breaking the rules, then send your complaints to an admin.

syltburk · #**132** 01-09-2004, 05:53 PM

Originally posted by Darlene159

Quote:

Opinions arent against the rules, for the millionth time, it is the way you give those opinions.

it is the way YOU take the oppinion, some times you can be fair and some times you may WANT to not get fact.

Quote:

If you think the mods are breaking the rules, then send your complaints to an admin.

Why?? Oh yeah i forgot threads get deleted all the time here

Ok i will stop i just got a warning of temp ban for 2 weeks, dont want that to happend because of this, sorry guys i leave this and smile

Spark910 · #**133** 01-09-2004, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by syltburk
Originally posted by Darlene159

Ok i will stop i just got a warning of temp ban for 2 weeks, dont want that to happend because of this, sorry guys i leave this and smile

lol that was only for your.. well about 20th post in a week that was just a quote and reply with '

' and nothing else. And the other examples I gave you

Thak2 · #**134** 01-09-2004, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
Opinions arent against the rules, for the millionth time, it is the way you give those opinions.

Is posting those opinions in a thread against the rules? Should they be pmed or something instead?

Darlene159 · #**135** 01-09-2004, 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thak2

Is posting those opinions in a thread against the rules? Should they be pmed or something instead?

If that were the case, there would be no sense in the forums.
This is a place for Graal members to discuss things, it is difficult to discuss things without giving an opinion on things. If you are referring to a specific subject, you will have to clarify what you mean.

syltburk · #**136** 01-09-2004, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
If that were the case, there would be no sense in the forums.
This is a place for Graal members to discuss things, it is difficult to discuss things without giving an opinion on things. If you are referring to a specific subject, you will have to clarify what you mean.

Why cant we have it then???

Darlene159 · #**137** 01-09-2004, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by syltburk

Why cant we have it then???

Why cant you have what? An opinion? How many times do I have to explain the same question?

marcoR · #**138** 01-09-2004, 07:43 PM

That wasn't spam, I was wondering where the greater portion of my posts went, silly goose.

syltburk · #**139** 01-09-2004, 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
Why cant you have what? An opinion? How many times do I have to explain the same question?

So many times so it seems to make sence

Divider · #**140** 01-09-2004, 07:52 PM

Didn't Unix warn you to stop this? Wasn't the other thread closed? Your saying your doing this because the 'rules arnt being enforced', If you care so much about the rules, stop breaking them?

Quote:

If a thread has been closed or deleted by a moderator or admin, it is intended that the topics held therein are to be discontinued

syltburk · #**141** 01-09-2004, 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Divider
Didn't Unix warn you to stop this? Wasn't the other thread closed? Your saying your doing this because the 'rules arnt being enforced', If you care so much about the rules, stop breaking them?

Um i think we, atleast me are not talking about that the rules ARN'T enforced, its that they Enforced them TO much, god divider...

Lance · #**142** 01-09-2004, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Divider
Didn't Unix warn you to stop this? Wasn't the other thread closed? Your saying your doing this because the 'rules arnt being enforced', If you care so much about the rules, stop breaking them?

This thread was created to propose an AIM chat to discuss the forums. That is not in violation of said rule.

Thak2 · #**143** 01-09-2004, 08:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
If that were the case, there would be no sense in the forums.
This is a place for Graal members to discuss things, it is difficult to discuss things without giving an opinion on things. If you are referring to a specific subject, you will have to clarify what you mean.

Why were those other complaint threads closed or deleted then? They didn't degenerate into insults or anything.

Divider · #**144** 01-09-2004, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lance

This thread was created to propose an AIM chat to discuss the forums. That is not in violation of said rule.

Funny, I could of sworn the AIM topc disapeared awhile back.

Lance · #**145** 01-09-2004, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Divider

Funny, I could of sworn the AIM topc disapeared awhile back.

Haven't seen one recently.

Darlene159 · #**146** 01-09-2004, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Thak2

Why were those other complaint threads closed and deleted then? They didn't degenerate into insults or anything.

Ever hear of overkill? Massive complaining, and giving an opinion on something are 2 different things. Yes, there were members who had legitiment questions, but there was also those who were doing nothing but complain. Angel closed the thread, you would have to ask her for the exact reason, but the fact that Unixmad made a post telling people to knock off the arguing or whatever, or he was going to start banning troublemakers, says alot....

syltburk · #**147** 01-09-2004, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
Ever hear of overkill? Massive complaining, and giving an opinion on something are 2 different things. Yes, there were members who had legitiment questions, but there was also those who were doing nothing but complain. Angel closed the thread, you would have to ask her for the exact reason, but the fact that Unixmad made a post telling people to knock off the arguing or whatever, or he was going to start banning troublemakers, says alot....

Rofl yeah massive complaining

But yes i agree there are 2 different things, we did give oppinions and stil you closed them, thats the difference, "massive complaining" have never excisted so far in this week sorry.

Darlene159 · #**148** 01-09-2004, 08:31 PM

Quote:

"massive complaining" have never excisted so far in this week sorry.

tell that to Unixmad

Crono · #**149** 01-09-2004, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Darlene159
Ever hear of overkill? Massive complaining, and giving an opinion on something are 2 different things. Yes, there were members who had legitiment questions, but there was also those who were doing nothing but complain. Angel closed the thread, you would have to ask her for the exact reason, but the fact that Unixmad made a post telling people to knock off the arguing or whatever, or he was going to start banning troublemakers, says alot....

Well here's something to think about.

WHY are we arguing all of the sudden? Let's check back now, ever since you and spark became super mod's people started arguing. JEBUS CHRIST I WONDER WTF WE'RE ARGUING ABOUT AND WHY NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE #$^%)#@^)%*

It doesnt take a hyper monkey to figure out that our arguing recently has been about the new "super" mods and how the rules have been enforced RECENTLY opposed to before you two "showed up" (you know what I mean -_-)

Unixmad fails to see whats going on and therefor is just trying to make it all stop without even knowing whats going on. Personally I want him to go over and read EVERYTHING and THEN and ONLY THEN tell us to stop being "trouble makers" (when the mods and super mods are actually the ones making all the trouble)

It's like we're being silienced for trying to do whats best for the forum. Cant you people see that we're risking a ban just to get things back to normal?

I'm going to stop there, all that needs to be said from me has been said. The rest I will continue over either PM or AIM...or something.

superb · #**150** 01-09-2004, 08:37 PM

"Overkill" is not a valid reason to close a thread. You guys just got tired of us making you look bad. No matter though. I just hope you guys start doing your job correctly.

Quote:

Originally posted by Gerami

(when the mods and super mods are actually the ones making all the trouble)

Actually, the mods are fine..it's the supermods that are struggling to do their job correctly.

protagonist · #**151** 01-09-2004, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by superb
"Overkill" is not a valid reason to close a thread. You guys just got tired of us making you look bad. No matter though. I just hope you guys start doing your job correctly.

How do you make someone look bad? By attacking them. What is another word for attacking? Flaming. What is against the rules? Flaming.

marcoR · #**152** 01-09-2004, 08:43 PM

where do we get bananas? the jungle, what's another word for the jungle? a wild place. what's another word for a wild place? a berlesque house. you're underage. against the law.

protagonist · #**153** 01-09-2004, 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marcoR
where do we get bananas? the jungle, what's another word for the jungle? a wild place. what's another word for a wild place? a berlesque house. you're underage. against the law.

That is too full of holes, it'd be impossible to list them all.

marcoR · #**154** 01-09-2004, 08:45 PM

I just thought your point was very.. broad.

protagonist · #**155** 01-09-2004, 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marcoR
I just thought your point was very.. broad.

Being attacked is generally seen as a bad thing, whereas wild places can be fun or scary or whatever.

marcoR · #**156** 01-09-2004, 08:48 PM

Some people like being attacked.. like gladiators =o

superb · #**157** 01-09-2004, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist

How do you make someone look bad? By attacking them. What is another word for attacking? Flaming. What is against the rules? Flaming.

Incorrect. The posts I'm referring to were not attacks. Complaint != attack. Arguing with a moderator's response != attack. Making a moderator look bad by adequately refuting their points to an extent where they no longer reply != attack.

Neoreno · #**158** 01-09-2004, 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by marcoR
Some people like being attacked.. like gladiators =o

Gladiators were actually slaves/prisoners forced to fight in the arena until they were killed.

marcoR · #**159** 01-09-2004, 09:01 PM

Some of them did it for a living, and actually gained great political power there in, actually.

D1ce2 · #**160** 01-09-2004, 09:07 PM

Looks like unix was right about the forums