Bel'la O' - Scammers United?

xAndrewx · #1 10-03-2005, 08:57 AM

I have accumulated a list, of all the thiefs inside of Bel'la O'.
As you're all aware, I don't like thiefs.
I can live with the killing, but not the thiefing.

EndlessX
OasaTorPK
xGoLink

I'm not too sure about Oasa, but when he was in Samurai, he stole some items during an event, I class that as being a thievery event.
Will any actions be taking? Or will we be looking at a new revolutionized kingdom full of thiefs?

Sam · #2 10-03-2005, 01:16 PM

It seems to be the the kingdom of outlaws.

AlaricoMontario · #3 10-03-2005, 02:01 PM

Kingdom? Not for long......

Damix2 · #4 10-03-2005, 03:14 PM

Debalgio doesn't make the list?

LilNiglet · #5 10-03-2005, 03:25 PM

It's like Karakaze minus the awesome.

Damix2 · #6 10-03-2005, 03:26 PM

Very true, and at least we tried to hide it...sometimes.

xAndrewx · #7 10-03-2005, 03:41 PM

Debalgio didn't scam, he traded fairly.
Item for item = fair. That's exactly what Debalgio and Jalaxe did.

StrykerTFFD · #8 10-03-2005, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx

Item for item = fair. That's exactly what Debalgio and Jalexia did.

Actually, going by the definition of 'Scam', If item one's value is less than item two's value or vice versa, then it is considered a scam if one or both parties are trick and/or deceived into trading.

Judging from the outrage of a lot of people, this is what happened.

xAndrewx · #9 10-03-2005, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StrykerTFFD

Actually, going by the definition of 'Scam', If item one's value is less than item two's value, then it is considered a scam if one or both parties are trick and/or deceived into trading.

Judging from the outrage of a lot of people, this is what happened.

That's true, but why click the green flag if you didn't think it was a fair trade?
[Not you, but Jalaxe]

Googi · #10 10-03-2005, 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx

Item for item = fair. That's exactly what Debalgio and Jalaxe did.

Item for item = fair unless of course there is lying involved. Etien told Jalexia he was just borrowing the items, which was a blatant lie. That makes it scamming.

xAndrewx · #11 10-03-2005, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Googi

Item for item = fair unless of course there is lying involved. Etien told Jalexia he was just borrowing the items, which was a blatant lie. That makes it scamming.

Why would she accept it, for the 2 rots? lol.

Sam · #12 10-03-2005, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx

Why would she accept it, for the 2 rots? lol.

Hey, we all know that she isn't dumb and accept this for her items as a trade for all time. We discuss that a lot of time so stop it here and let's go back to the topic.

XGoLink · #13 10-03-2005, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

Hey, we all know that she isn't dumb

Are you sure, she did join CP!

xAndrewx · #14 10-03-2005, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schlurfy

Hey, we all know that she isn't dumb and accept this for her items as a trade for all time. We discuss that a lot of time so stop it here and let's go back to the topic.

That's true, it's for another conversation.
My mistake

Googi · #15 10-03-2005, 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xAndrewx

Why would she accept it, for the 2 rots? lol.

Jalexia thought she was lending her items (which included her two RoWs) to Etien. She wanted to borrow two RoTs in order to compensate for the speed loss she would have while she didn't have the RoWs.