Decision 2005: Part One!

[Lance]

As the release of Graal2001 grows ever closer, there are still some loose ends that we need to tie up.

Refer to the poll title.

[Damix2]

How can you use both?

[Deek2]

I chose option 3 - Size changes allows a much wider variety of customization and diversity for players.

[ApothiX]

I think you should use the second one, it looks more realistic IMO. Down with dwarves!

[Eagle]

I chose 3. I think it would be better for players to havea choice. So yeah, I agree with Deek,

[Fry]

2, because they look more realistic, better, and they can be colored too as the old bodies can.

[Googi]

I'm going with 1, not because of looks but functionality. The old bodies had fast slashing, good shields, and all that stuff people loved. Everyone is always saying "Well we can have that in new bodies," but nobody ever does it.

[Lance]

Originally Posted by Googi

I'm going with 1, not because of looks but functionality. The old bodies had fast slashing, good shields, and all that stuff people loved. Everyone is always saying "Well we can have that in new bodies," but nobody ever does it.

This is a poll about looks, not functionality.

[Googi]

Originally Posted by Lance

This is a poll about looks, not functionality.

Because you think you're going to transfer all the functional characteristics of old bodies to new bodies.

[Fox1545]

Originally Posted by Googi

The old bodies had fast slashing, good shields, and all that stuff people loved. Everyone is always saying "Well we can have that in new bodies," but nobody ever does it.

Originally Posted by Infernix

Obviously the first one if your gonna have sparring and pking cause ahh seriouly you cant spar and pk the right way with type two. Now if your gonn have lame custom sword and etc. Go ahead and use that 2nd body. Most players who prefer classic wont play anyways.

How the hell is fast slashing and proper sparring and playerkilling an issue of which body graphic is used?

Originally Posted by Gerami

First one because it's classic and body 2 was originally meant for Graal 2002 (graal kingdoms) anyway.

And the classic bodies were originally meant for classic. So what?

[Lord Sephiroth]

Are there any other examples or bodies that are like the second one? I'd like to see something thats not straight black with a blue coat before I decide.

[zell12]

Old Bodies, or newer ones with clothes and stuff.

[Spark910]

Any chance of getting more details about each one?
This is rather a vague poll, I wouldn't be that convinced I'd know what I'm voting for just off three pictures that looks very similar.

[Lance]

Originally Posted by Spark910

Any chance of getting more details about each one?
This is rather a vague poll, I wouldn't be that convinced I'd know what I'm voting for just off three pictures that looks very similar.

The first two are two different body styles: the first is the 'classic' body style that Graal2001 used originally and the second is the 'human' body style that Graal2001 was changed to a while back. The last one is a cute picture of both of them together.

[petro1212]

The longer strechted body looks much nicer.

Take games such as Ragnarok. Same body style (somehow) and way more functional and looks way better than the normal graal midigit body.
Anatomicly correct boddies are a must for a self respecting mmorpg >.>
If graal2001 would pimp up their graphics a bit it would realy help, bomy moon had some of the best graphics compared to what graal had before that. And that was part of the success (or so I belief)