Idea

[Warcaptain]

ok here is something that really needs to be added:

testarrow(x,y)

thanks

[Merlin]

test arrow?

[Jerom]

Originally posted by Merlin
test arrow?

For when arrows shot by a bow are put onto the level and reach a certain x/y...

[Warcaptain]

can be used to make a much much easier reflectarrow

[Jerom]

Originally posted by Warcaptain
can be used to make a much much easier reflectarrow

If arrows could go diagonal, then I could make a pretty 1337 arrow puzzel
Not to mension traps would be alot better.

[kyle0654]

Uh, I'd hate to tell you, but the chances of landing testarrow(x,y) on an arrow are slim to none. The x,y specified must be a nontransparent point on the object (arrow in this case). Arrows are too small for that. You should just use arrow indexes and stuff.

[Warcaptain]

but maybe you only want to block at a single place

[Cloud_X]

Kyle is right kthx bye

[wetferret1]

He is right!

[fuzie]

wasshot is fine wit me thank you

[Warcaptain]

wasshot wont test an arrow..
it has nothing to do with it..

[Tyhm]

I think the effect you seek can be mimiced by a for/next arrows[this.i] loop, or possibly wasshot and that hitpower variable...but I've never used it.

[fuzie]

Originally Posted by Jerom :If arrows could go diagonal, then I could make a pretty 1337 arrow puzzel

cant b/c some users wouldnt be able to have that function b/c u need a scelleration card or sumfin i 4get

[Warcaptain]

but wouldnt things be simpler if test errow would exist!

[entravial]

Use a for loop...

And arrows[i].x/arrows[i].y...

Like, say... *scripts up something in five seconds*

if (playerenters){
toweapons Useless Thingy;
}
if (weaponfired){
for (i=0;i<arrowscount;i++){
if (arrows[i].x=1 && arrows[i].y=1){
reflectarrow i;
}
}
}

Or something... *shrugs*