P2P Playerworlds

[Warcaptain]

Okay, here are my thoughts on
P2P Playerworlds

Quite frankly the requirements for Servers are too strict for P2P severs.
I beleive the requirements should be smaller since its more difficult to make a GOOD p2p playerworld offline.

1) 100 Public Levels-
Explaination:
The playerworld must make a public world with at least 100 levels.
Not a one level playerworld with a waterfall.. what fun is that?

2) 2 Quests-
Explaination:
Since many arent sure what they want for their life system (since they yet dont know the full capabilities of p2p scripting) they shouldnt have to make a life system untill the server is up and they know all the capabilites of p2p.

3) Mini-Map, Big Map-
Explaination:
Do you need explaination for this? If your really that ignorant, then ill explain. Yo should need a big map and a mini map (128 pixel width of the big map) Of the server's overworld.

And that about wraps up what I beleive the requirements should be.

I think they are fair and just.

[Merlin]

hi.

[Warcaptain]

yes thank you for that deep comment.

[Merlin]

k.

[KJS]

the 2 quest thing is not a good idea..
because a server could be just full of fun and games like 2001... even though they have quests... but like when they first came out...

[LiquidIce00]

Originally posted by KJS
the 2 quest thing is not a good idea..
because a server could be just full of fun and games like 2001... even though they have quests... but like when they first came out...

problem with p2p servers is they get so much into the whole "I got a npc server I can make cool events" crap that they forget that the originality of the game (zelda) was basically quests

[Warcaptain]

I think at LEAST 2 quests is good, mini-games are optional.

but they are something that would be good to have to make your PW better.

[Silver Knight]

Cookies are good

[grim_squeaker_x]

Originally posted by Warcaptain
1) 100 Public Levels-
Explaination:
The playerworld must make a public world with at least 100 levels.
Not a one level playerworld with a waterfall.. what fun is that?

Yay, so what do we get then? Lots of pure grass levels, whee!

2) 2 Quests-
Explaination:
Since many arent sure what they want for their life system (since they yet dont know the full capabilities of p2p scripting) they shouldnt have to make a life system untill the server is up and they know all the capabilites of p2p.

It is possible to make a perfectly functioning life system without needing P2P, if you don't believe me I'll send you one I made once.
And I'm wondering what this has to do with having 2 quests.

3) Mini-Map, Big Map-
Explaination:
Do you need explaination for this? If your really that ignorant, then ill explain. Yo should need a big map and a mini map (128 pixel width of the big map) Of the server's overworld.

Actually, that's already a rule for any server.

[slp]

Originally posted by KJS
the 2 quest thing is not a good idea..
because a server could be just full of fun and games like 2001... even though they have quests... but like when they first came out...

[slp]

Originally posted by Warcaptain
I think at LEAST 2 quests is good, mini-games are optional.

but they are something that would be good to have to make your PW better.

no its stupid not all servers need to have quests so its a bad idea

[Death_Sythe]

The almost every p2p server really does stink..but Stewfan doesnt want to shut down servers thoinking that they would cry and all, he beleaves in hard work, but alot of players dont like most of the servers, and they mostly have 1-5 players on it and mayby get to 20 on a really good day, but I think that Stefan should do something such as give the player worlds a month to get it better and then ge atleast 60 people on it or it will be shut down.

[Slaktmaster]

Jag är snygg

[Slaktmaster]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA TRUNKS IS FAKIN RETRATAED HA AH LLE

[Dilandou]

Originally posted by Slaktmaster
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA TRUNKS IS FAKIN RETRATAED HA AH LLE

oh no =(