Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gerami
I personally believe some kind of guidelines should be placed forward by the PWA team so that some classic playerworlds don't stay the same and crappy.
|
No need for the PWAs to do so, when development is already being worked on.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by warp2ukew
I will post for you Crono :P
Delteria is trying to create a new overworld, so they should definitly be put back into the developing process and taken off the classic list.
Atlantis will not be taken off the list because it's the only German server. If Galbadia or whatever came back, then hopefully Atlantis would be removed.
|
Why does everyone want servers off of the list? It makes no sense what so ever. Just because their in development doesnt mean they need to be removed from the Classic Tab. They have a private Development Server for a reason.
Most servers that arent doing so good, usually go into a big Development stage of hopes to have a decent daily playercount after their development is complete. Delteria has a decent playercount every
night and weekend.
Im not sure if im making much sense, but if Delteria has the current requirements to be on the Classic list, and are just
improving themselves, what's the point to take them off? GraalOnline wants to attract players, not have them leave because a server was removed for no good reason, you know? It's like why are people complaining so much (Not directed to a sole player) that servers stay online? If servers that dont reach atleast a minimum of 40 players a day were to be removed from the classic tab, you could say goodbye to a few servers and alot of players.
Also, you cant forget about the players in different timezones than yourself, youd be suprised at how many players come on when your in bed sleeping. I guess i can understand if a server was on the classic tab, no staff came online for days at a time and the daily playercount is low (5-10 daily), yes it should be removed. My point is that all the current 'inactive' servers on the classic tab are making a clear attempt at improving for the future, meaning staff come on all the time and develop, they still manage to have ETs host events for the players that do come online (Consideration/care). penalizing inactive playerworlds by putting them on the private list (especially when an attempt to improve is being made) is pointless in my opinion. If it does come to a decision, i think it should be up to the Owner of the server if he/she wants their Playerworld temporarily private due to inactivity.