Multiple Server Staff

warp2ukew · #1 07-21-2006, 02:37 AM

Can managers please start enforcing a no multiple server staffing rule? I am sick of seeing people post about a new server everyday

This is coming from someone who used to staff ***** (if you were around when I was an ambitious playerworld maker, new idea a day!) you will remember. If not, oh well.

I hope you all see my point. I don't think it would matter if someone was just "helping out" but that definitly doesn't involve that person making posts about the server and such. It will help get playerworlds done faster and even though a lot of talent is spread out now, it will keep the spreadness to a limit.

killerogue · #2 07-21-2006, 03:00 AM

I'm currently only doing 2 server ideas.

warp2ukew · #3 07-21-2006, 03:30 AM

ONLY? That's two servers you "manage." Also, you work for 20, 000 servers. So it comes to 20, 002.

killerogue · #4 07-21-2006, 03:51 AM

I do not work on 20,000 servers. If you're so sure name 5 other servers I supposedly work on. O_O

Mykel · #5 07-21-2006, 04:02 AM

Ehh, while some people take it to extremes , there just aren't enough developers for most managers to set such restrictions.

killerogue · #6 07-21-2006, 04:04 AM

Yes, I'll admit I have posted for quite a few servers. To be honest. I'd say about seven or so asking for staff.

Aculeus
Anchilles
Antipitar
Stone Henge

Name more please because if I did I remember no others?

E: Also Mykel it may seem as if I advertise more than one server every day but usually the reason is that the server I'm currently using has a different name than the one we're going to use so you may see 2 threads named differently but will be about the same server.

warp2ukew · #7 07-21-2006, 05:13 AM

You work for others, saying you announced even that many is pretty bad.

killerogue · #8 07-21-2006, 05:20 AM

I do not work for any others besides the two servers now. And tonight I was just hired to work for Calanis Kingdom on GK.

Crono · #9 07-21-2006, 05:35 AM

As mykel already said, there's not enough developers for the one staff at a time rule.

warp2ukew · #10 07-21-2006, 05:45 AM

Well when you think about it, there is. This way, manager will KNOW when their project will fail because someone such as you would quit (of your quality) and *SuperSaiyanGohanSSJOOCLevel90MarriedToZeldaPrince ss will start making the levels, and the manager will lose hope and shut down the server. Any decent staff he would have would move on, until hopefully PWs could be made into a tighter community with some actual decent **** going on.

Crono get on AIM

bgumeny · #11 07-25-2006, 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by warp2ukew

Well when you think about it, there is. This way, manager will KNOW when their project will fail because someone such as you would quit (of your quality) and *SuperSaiyanGohanSSJOOCLevel90MarriedToZeldaPrince ss will start making the levels, and the manager will lose hope and shut down the server. Any decent staff he would have would move on, until hopefully PWs could be made into a tighter community with some actual decent **** going on.

Crono get on AIM

While I 100% agree with you, if you look at it from a purely business perspective (as the GraalOnline adminstrators surely do) it does not make sense. Say the manager shuts down his server because SuperSaiyanGohanLevel90 (pretty amusing btw) makes crappy levels, that means that GraalOnline will start losing the 99 dollars that people shell out because they think their server will actually make it.

If the only playerworlds that were given space were the ones that actually stood a chance, we would have playerworld1-playerworld10, at most, as opposed to the playerworld1-playerworld9328493 that we have now. Losing that income would either mean GraalOnline failing or us having to pay way more for the servers that truly had a chance, as well as a significant hike in our VIP and Gold subscriptions as well.