Problems with Playerworld Rules

[Spark910]

Okay well I am going to look into the rules and see if I can change them to make them alot less controlling. Its clear to see playerworld managers dislike them, and I agree then can be less controlling but still secure.

So which rules do you dislike? I have made a list which I think are the ones.

Managers should have level4 RCs but no other staff member should have level4 RC as it’s not needed as the Manager should be active to perform certain task that can't be done without a level4 RC. A third RC can be given to the highest positioned admin, if needed

No playerworld should have more than 3 level4 RCs. If you want to use a 3rd then you must keep the level 4 RC on the admin-playerworld## account. Those playerworlds that were not setup by means of payment can give this RC to another account

No playerworld should have more than three other high levelled RCs (level3), as rights are not needed and people can ask for things instead of performing actions their selves.

Only managers should have full right RCs for security reasons.

Because bans are often done for incorrect or wrong reasons only people with level3 or level4 RCs should be allowed to ban. This means that 5 people (MAX) should be able to ban all the time. If you are a playerworld with a high playercount (70+) then a GP Admin may also be given banning rights.

Basically I think its the ones about the rights a person can have, is this correct? If there are any others people dislike or object to then please look at the rules [HERE] and see which ones are a problem.