Rings/Amulets

konidias · #1 08-16-2002, 04:34 PM

I think more rings and amulets should be wearable. Maybe not amulets, but at least rings. I'm pretty sure people have more than 2 fingers.

Maybe four rings at least? There's extra room and stuff in that inventory area.

ChocoboGrn · #2 08-16-2002, 08:44 PM

The reason for only two rings is that the magical fields/properties of the rings will usually overlap and disrupt one another...

At least, it's a reason that most mud's don't allow more than 2 rings.

Evil_Lord_Sparda · #3 08-16-2002, 10:09 PM

This could even pave the way for nobility in kingdoms. For instance rich nobles could have several rings to show their status

konidias · #4 08-17-2002, 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChocoboGrn
The reason for only two rings is that the magical fields/properties of the rings will usually overlap and disrupt one another...

At least, it's a reason that most mud's don't allow more than 2 rings.

Yes, well muds also usually have you lose 1/3rd of your exp and some stats when you die, but people don't come up and stab you in the back while you're mining, in a mud.

Some things should change, as a mud is not a massive online action/rpg like Graal.

MasterNuke · #5 08-17-2002, 05:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by ChocoboGrn
The reason for only two rings is that the magical fields/properties of the rings will usually overlap and disrupt one another...

At least, it's a reason that most mud's don't allow more than 2 rings.

How about 2 Magical and the rest can be non-magical? eh?

aylad · #6 08-18-2002, 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MasterNuke

How about 2 Magical and the rest can be non-magical? eh?

Non-magical ring.... armor +.0000005