Quote:
Originally posted by Milkdude99
Whether it is justified or not or even valid for that matter , if Stefan and Stephane deem it what they want your point is moot.
|
Sigh. Predictably, you
yet again missed the point. I was indicating that just because they approve rules does not mean that the rules are in the best interests of the game. Just because they listen to your ideas and approve your rules does not make them correct. They are
not infallible, as you seem to want us to believe.
Quote:
|
Bluntly right or wrong it is their game.
|
Demonstrate the relevance of this to your argument, please. Otherwise, this statement merely serves to support my point.
Quote:
|
and if you want to play it then you have to accept the terms as they lay them out or move on to something else.
|
But they can be debated, modified, or improved. They are not locked in stone. You will note that Spark has already modified some of the rules. Some of my suggestions were even put into place in their initial assembly.
Quote:
|
No one is going to force you to play or stay but to stay means acceptance of the rules.
|
Incorrect. To stay means that I agree to abide by them, not that I agree to accept them. There is a difference, though I don't expect you to understand that.