Quote:
Originally posted by protagonist
His thread had no other point than to make a joke of other people's work, and it was a waste of forum room.
|
The intention was to amuse people, and make a point at the same time. Are either of these things illegal? Do the supermods delete all threads that they consider unimportant?
Quote:
|
He was once again accusing the PWA of favouratism, and that can be interpreted as the "___ is corrupt" rule.
|
No such rule. Get with the times, man.
Anyway, if Spark couldn't stand to see the suggestion that he wasn't maintaining perfect impartiality then he could've simply deleted the relevant post. He didn't have to close the thread.
Quote:
|
There are too many idiots to have a thread for each of them.
|
And people aren't making threads for each of them, so there isn't a problem.
Quote:
|
The actual topic was over
|
And you had solid proof that nobody would've posted an on-topic message in the future? Did you conduct a survey, or just read everybody's minds? Maybe you asked God?
Or are users only allowed to post if they get there within the first couple of days?
Quote:
|
people were just jumping on the flame bandwagon. It wouldn't have stopped, it just would have kept up it's cycle.
|
Here's another cycle:
Delete offending posts
Warn flamers
Go to Step One
Don't punish all the users for the actions of two! If you do, you let the rulebreakers control you.