Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
By what definition?
|
His thread had no other point than to make a joke of other people's work, and it was a waste of forum room.
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
So he wanted to start an argument, big deal. If things reached a point where he was breaking the rules, the offending posts could've been deleted. He wasn't the only one interested in the topic, and nor was he the only one affected by Spark's rash actions.
|
He was once again accusing the PWA of favouratism, and that can be interpreted as the "___ is corrupt" rule.
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
Regardless of whether or not you consider community awareness important (how many times have you PWA dudes had to pick up the pieces after a known idiot is hired by an uninformed manager?), it should not have been closed. The only reasonable options were to remove it, or leave it there.
|
There are too many idiots to have a thread for each of them.
Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
So everybody has to suffer? Here's an idea: Next time somebody flames somebody else, let's delete the entire forums!!!
|
The actual topic was over, people were just jumping on the flame bandwagon. It wouldn't have stopped, it just would have kept up it's cycle.