[Lance]

Originally posted by Deek2

No I didn't. I don't see anywhere where this statement has some clarity.

Okay, doofus, you posted: "I suppose it's symbolism for the fact that he's hurt other peoples feelings. He keeps IMing me all of these replies to people's posts, all of which seem pretty conjective themselves."

Note the word "conjective." Note that it doesn't exist. Note that you persist in saying a) That you never said it, and b) that someone's posts are stupid for noting that you did.

How about using the read>post analogy before someone else other than me realises the flaws and mistakes in your stupidity and your posts.

Your next statement's a good response to your previous one:

Hey now, let's not be hypocritical. And before you try looking that definition up:
hyp·o·crit·i·cal ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hp-krt-kl)
adj.

1. Characterized by hypocrisy: hypocritical praise.
2. Being a hypocrite: a hypocritical rogue.
Hey, before trying to insult someone's stupidity, let's try making sure were not acting like imbeciles first so it doesn't backfire, ok?

You're posting without thinking or reading (Specifically, you're not reading your very own posts, of which you should have greater knowledge but for some reason don't) - Don't criticize others for doing so.

It does? What a poor analogy. I could say that your poor interpretation of who I'm talking to directly makes it seem like you know less about what were actually talking about. See what I mean?

Sigh. Someone doesn't know what an analogy is. Hint: It's you. My 'interpretation' of who you're directing your post at is irrelevant. The point is that your post lacks a clear display of who said what and who you're responding to. Such behavior is confusing, and muddles your own argument.

Please don't use words that you don't understand the meanings of, especially when you call someone else stupid in the same post. It just makes you look to be what you're accusing others of. Thank you.
-The Forum Community