[Lance]

Originally posted by Splke


Wow... that was a very good use of word... Connotation is like, something I hardly ever see writen in correct form... I appluade you for that...

Thanks, I pride myself on my diction.

Warning arent sposed to be done via pm for bans.

Eh?

Their supposed to be e-mailed to the person on account of 1-3 warnings,

Ehx2?

1. being a notice of their wrong doing, 2. being the consequence of their continued wrong doing, 3. being the notice of them being banned for so and so and the reason why / when theyll be unbanned.

Where are these rules stated? They don't exist, man.

If he didnt receive that, it's your mistake for not doing such and believing "ANYBODY" who is banned is actually gonna agree with you if you say you sent them warnings via PM. (I forgot what forum thread I found the ban information under x.x I might search for it to ed

Uh. I don't care if people agree with me, man. If they do bad stuff, they should expect a punishment. Making it impossible for a newbie to play is a bad thing. I guess Water Lord and Vamp and friends don't really care about Graal, its playerbase, or its future.

Hm, that sounds abit ****y and arrogant... Unno, Tseng has a very strong amount of respect, and has made alot of very good decisions based on bans and such, but some that were abit contraversol (sp) or simply unjust.

Man, I don't know how anyone can put two completely contradictory things together in a sentence, but somehow you manage to pull it off with some modifiers. Anyway, the point of that paragraph was to tell him to go ahead and attempt to get me fired - it isn't going to work, because I'm in the right. It's kinda how the justice system works - If a judge sends someone to jail, they pretty much go to jail. You can't just say "BAD DECISION THE JUDGE SHOULD BE FIRED" and expect it to happen, especially when they've got a rather good history for validity of ban-reasons.

Hmm. Not exactly correct. Of course, me and Tseng have had this arguement before on what harrassment was, or was not, so I'ma just put this lil' thingy mabob definition.

The main reason Water Lord's ban was extended was because of just what a ban is - to teach a person a lesson. If he doesn't learn his lesson (and proves that to the rest of us), why should he be unbanned?

Harrass - 1. to trouble, worry, or tormen, as with cares, questions, debts, repeted questions etc. 2. to trouble by repeated rabids or attacks, etc; harry -harr-ass'|er n. -harr.ass'ment n.

He's "troubling, worrying, or tormenting" me.

Of course, the all so brilliant people whom first lowered others by calling them of low intellect will not look at the fact that the way "attacks" is used in this definition has to do with both persons being active and both being aware. If somebody is "afk" on and sitting by duel arena, their usually there so they wont be killed on-screen and drop things.

Okay, so they're there. There's a possibility they were AFK - Does that mean that people have a right to kill them every 0.05 seconds, flooding every other player's screen? You can't tell me in good faith that that's the case, man.

He never actually called anybody on this thread corrupt, he simply said he'd talk to Stefen about it, which doesnt mean he's going to voice his opinion on you being corrupt or not (my vote is not) but he may simply try to get his ban lifted.

Doesn't matter. He didn't learn his lesson - that's the important thing.

Course, the idea of a ban is to discontinue somebodys action(s) from a server if they are violating rules, unless, the ban definition I was recently warned for and givin proper defintion about is incorrect, which I doubt. ;o

I think I agree with you, but your phrasing and punctuation are kinda confusing.

anywhom, this thread has become a all-out bash against Tseng, so stop