Quote:
Originally posted by Lance
He was merely pointing out further hypocrisy of yours. *shrug*
|
Since when is name calling pointing out anything other than name calling? Did he not say **** and call me an idiot? This is a flame and you can color it in any other fashion. There is no hypocrisy because I did not say what you said I said in this quote.
Quote:
|
Then why did you say that he would be unable to do a good job? If you judge a category, you are applying your judgement to each member of that category, man. You're contradicting yourself. Either you judge that all pwa members, and thus Chris (in this hypothetical situation) would need to spend 100% of their time on graal doing PWA work and if they don't do that then they're not doing a good job, OR you aren't making that judgement. Make up your mind.
|
I never said he could not do a good job , you said that not me , I challenge you to find any post on this Forum where I said "Chirs cannot do a good job". To give 100% of yourself to one job does not mean you can give 100% to more that one , that isn't even good math. 100% is exactly that not 50/50 not 75/25 it is 100%. If you divide your time then you are not giving 100% to either job that is my only point not whether you are doing a good job or not . You may do a good job at both but you cannot give your best to both because you have to split yourself so therefore it is NOT 100% to either. You are the only one that tried to say I said anyone who doesn't give 100% does a bad job, that is not what I said so therefore there is no contradiction.