Quote:
Originally posted by Kaimetsu
Not really. All but the most shallow people play MMORPGs for the gameplay, not the quality of the graphics. Again and again I say: What the hell.
1) Have you even been reading the thread? We're talking about the differences in graphical quality, not style. And specifically in relation to Graal. If Playerworld X had beautiful graphics but terrible scripts, whereas Playerworld Y had default graphics and superb design, which would be more popular?
2) Putting 'side-scrolling graphics' into a folder is not the same as making a side-scrolling game. The programming defines every single part of game's behaviour. How the user interacts with it, how it reacts to his actions, etc. The graphics are just a visual representation of the underlying game.
Sure, perhaps even by a whole 1%.
Again, missing the entire point of the debate. This is why I shouldn't argue with artists.
Nice work. Now try again without missing the entire focus of the argument.
Unfortunately your weariness is not justification to close a thread. You don't matter as much as you think you do.
|
Playerworld x has great graphic but no scripts while playerworld y had graphic and great scripts. But playerworld Z great scripts but very very bad graphic.
See Kaimetsu they would rather play playerworld y because it has graphic maybe not the best but it has them and it has great scripts that use them. Scripts might define the playerworld "and things" but with good graphic its not as fun. So I would have to say that scripts nor graphic are better then each other. Both of them combinded are great cant you see that? Both need to be done well you cant say 1 is more important then the other.